A steel mill with variable speed drives (VSDs) had problems of frequent tripping of the VSDs with the indication ‘overvoltage in AC line’. Each tripping caused severe production disruption and resulted in considerable monetary loss due to lost production.
Steady-state measurements by true RMS voltmeter showed that voltage was normal and within the specified operating range of the VDS. A power line monitor was then used in the distribution board feeding the VSDs and the incoming power feeder to the mill. At both locations, the monitors showed transient overvoltages of damped oscillatory type waveform with an initial amplitude of over 2.0 pu and a ringing frequency of about 700 Hz.
The timing of disturbances coincided with the closing of capacitor banks in the utility substation feeding the steel mill (refer Figure 1a below).
It was confirmed by the VSD manufacturer that the VSDs were provided with overvoltage protection set to operate at 1.6 pu voltage for disturbances exceeding 40 µs.
It may be noted that switching on a bank of capacitors results in high charging current inrush. When this current passes through the line’s inductance L, a momentary voltage surge occurs. Further interaction of the capacitor C with inductance L results in an oscillatory flow of current, which is damped by the resistance R in the system.
The oscillatory disturbance superimposed over the normal power-frequency voltage wave caused the overvoltage protection to operate.
The solution lies in reducing the transient peak to a value that is below the overvoltage protection threshold.
This was achieved in this case by installing a surge protection device (SPD) in each VSD. The SPD clamped the transient to a peak value of 1.5 pu thus avoiding the operation of overvoltage protection.
Another possible solution would have been to install an inductor L1 in the switching circuit of the capacitor for a few seconds and then shunt it by switch S.
Since the voltage seen by the incoming feeder to the mill would be the combination across C and L1, the transient will have a smaller amplitude. This solution will however call for cooperation from the utility as it involves additional equipment to be installed by them (refer Figure 1b above).
Reference: Practical Grounding, Bonding, Shielding and Surge Protection – G. Vijayaraghavan, Mark Brown and Malcolm Barnes (Get your harcopy from Amazon)