Search
Home / Technical Articles / Applying CTs in protection schemes for transformers, generators, machines etc.

Protection schemes and CTs

Various types of instrument transformers are currently in use on the basis of the varied applications of these devices. The construction aspects and sizing play an important role in the selection of proper types of both CTs and VTs.

Applying CTs in protection schemes for transformers, generators, machines etc.
Applying CTs in protection schemes for transformers, generators, machines etc.

The design principles of these transformers are different from those of power transformers because accuracy is of prime importance and these transformers are lightly loaded in comparison to power transformers.

This technical article explains seven applications of CTs in protection schemes for machines, generators, generator-transformers, transformers, transmission lines, etc. as well as the most important design considerations:

Contents:

  1. Application of CTs in various protection schemes:
    1. Differential Protection
    2. Percentage or Biased Differential Protection
    3. Restricted Earth Fault Protection (REF)
    4. Interposing CT
    5. Core Balance CT
    6. Summation CT
    7. Current Balance CT
  2. Important design considerations:
    1. Selection of Secondary Current Rating
    2. Selection of Primary Current Rating
    3. Selection of Rated Burden
    4. Selection of Class of Accuracy

Application of CTs in various protection schemes

1. Differential Protection

Differential protection is used for the protection of generators, generator-transformers, transformers, transmission lines, large motors, bus zones, etc.

The principle of any differential relay is that it responds to vector difference between two or more similar electrical quantities.

The protected zone is determined by the location of CTs or VTs secondary.

In Figure 1, X is the winding of the machine to be protected. During healthy condition, the current entering in X is equal in phase and magnitude to the current leaving X. CT1 and CT2 are of such a ratio that during the normal conditions or for external faults, the secondary current of a CT is equal.

The vector differential current I1 − I2 through the relay coil is therefore zero, i.e. I1 − I2 = 0 during normal conditions or for external faults.

Differential protection
Figure 1 – Differential protection

When a fault occurs in the protected zone, the current entering the protected winding is no longer equal to the current leaving the winding as some current flows to the fault.

The differential current I1 − I2 flows through the relay operating coil and the relay operates if the operating torque is more than the re-straining torque.

Go back to contents ↑


2. Percentage or Biased Differential Protection

In the above paragraph, we have discussed how differential protection of various machines is achieved. But in actual conditions, the differential relay has to overcome the trouble arising out of the differences in CT ratios for high values of external short-circuit currents.

The differential relay is provided with an additional coil, i.e. a re-straining coil.

Percentage or biased differential protection
Figure 2  – Percentage or biased differential protection

Go back to contents ↑


3. Restricted Earth Fault Protection

When the earth fault occurs at, say, point ‘f’ of generator winding, voltage VAF will be available which will drive fault current IF through neutral to ground connection. This voltage VAF will be relatively less when the fault point is nearer to terminal ‘a’.

Hence IF will also be reduced but if the relay setting is kept too low, it may respond during through faults.

In practice, only 85% of the generator winding is protected against a phase-to-earth fault and 15% of the portion is left unprotected.

Restricted earth fault protection
Figure 3 –  Restricted earth fault protection

Go back to contents ↑


4. Interposing CT

An intermediate CT (or shorter ICT) is used for feeding protective or measuring devices which require operating current that is different from the main CT secondary current.

For example, in case the main CT ratio is 50/5 A and the relay requires a 1 A rating, then an ICT of ratio 5/1 shall be used. It may be noted that the ICT’s internal burden is to be fed by the output of the main CT.

Go back to contents ↑


5. Core Balance CT (CBCT)

A core balance CT (or CBCT) is used in sensitive earth fault protection schemes. The CBCT is a ring type LTCT put around a three-core cable to detect zero sequence current (earth leakage current in the system).

For single-core cables, all three cables must pass through a CBCT. The CBCT secondary feeds a sensitive earth fault relay.

This arrangement can detect a primary earth leakage current of the order of 500 mA. It may be noted that the design of a CBCT is entirely different from that of a normal CT.

Since the magnetising current and primary current are of the same order, the ratio of a CBCT is very significant, but one has to verify the operation of the relay at a specified current.

Core balance scheme (Frame leakage arranged for detecting earth faults on line)
Figure 4 – Core balance scheme (Frame leakage arranged for detecting earth faults on line)

The termination of a three core cable into three separate lines or bus-bars is through cable terminal box. The core balance protection is used along with the cable box and should be installed before making the cable joint.

The induced current flowing through cable sheath of normal healthy cable need particular attention with respect to the core balance protection. The sheath current (Ish) flow through the sheath to the cover cable box and then to earth through the earthing connection between cable box.

For eliminating the error due to sheath current (Ish) the earthing lead between the cable box and the earth should be taken through the core of the core balance protection.

Thereby the error due to sheath current is eliminated. The cable box should be insulated from earth.

Go back to contents ↑


6. Summation CT

A summation CT seen in Figure 4 is used for the vector addition of several feeder currents. It may be noted that the main CT ratio of feeder CTs 1 and 2 should be the same.

Summation CT
Figure 4 – Summation CT

Go back to contents ↑


7. Current Balance CT

A special use of CTs is in a current balance scheme. It comprises a set of two numbers. The CTs used in this scheme per phase is known as a ‘current balance CT‘.

Figure 5 shows the two circuit breakers CB1 and CB2, each feeding half the total load current (I). This arrangement is necessitated when a CB manufacturer does not have a CB of full impedance of paths A-CB1-B and A-CB2-B.  Since the latter cannot be identical, the currents in the two paths will be:

I1 ≠ I2 ≠ I/2

In order to maintain the same I/2 in both branches, current balance CTs (CT1 and CT2) are used. Using cross-connected secondary, the primary of CT1 ‘sees’ a reflected burden proportional to the impedance of branch 2 (and vice versa).

This makes the apparent impedance of both branches equal and I1 becomes approximately equal to I2.

Current balance CT
Figure 5 – Current balance CT

Go back to contents ↑


Important design considerations

1. Selection of Secondary Current Rating

For a given distance between the burden (relay or instrument) and the CT, the adoption of 1 A as the rated secondary current reduces the lead burden to 1/ 25th of its value at 5 A secondary current.

For any particular rated primary current and select value of primary ampere-turns, the lower the rated secondary current, the finer will be the adjustment to the ratio error by the use of turns correction. The disadvantage in selecting 1 A rated secondary current is that a more expensive, finer gauge wire is required.

Also, 1 A secondary current would, all other things being equal, develop five times the peak voltage that of a 5 A secondary.

Go back to contents ↑


2. Selection of Primary Current Rating

The ratio error and phase error of a measuring CT are influenced by the number of available primary ampere-turns to a greater extent than by any other single factor, and this is equally true for the performance of a protective CT.

Thus there is a minimum value of primary current for any particular application for which a ring type or similar CT may be used without making it unduly large or expensive.

If the rated primary current is below this value, it is suggested that wound-primary construction be used but again there is a minimum limit determined this time by the maximum dynamic and thermal stresses for a given class of accuracy and burden. The lower the rated primary current, the larger would be the core required.

Go back to contents ↑


3. Selection of Rated Burden

The ratio error for any particular value of the flux density is lowest for an overall secondary power factor of unity. The difference between the actual and test values of the ratio error depends upon factors such as:

  1. The flux density,
  2. The proportion of the total secondary circuit impedance supplied by the secondary winding, or
  3. The core material and the type of core construction.

In any application that demands high accuracy, the errors of CTs must be measured wherever possible with the working burden and not with the rated burden.

The rated burden should be kept as near to the actual burden as possible to obtain better accuracy.

Go back to contents ↑


4. Selection of Class of Accuracy

The class of accuracy should be chosen carefully as it directly affects the size and cost of the CT. This effect applies more to lower ratio CTs.

Go back to contents ↑

Reference // Handbook of switchgears by BHEL – Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited

Premium Membership

Premium membership gives you an access to specialized technical articles and extra premium content (electrical guides and software).
Get Premium Now ⚡
author-pic

Edvard Csanyi

Electrical engineer, programmer and founder of EEP. Highly specialized for design of LV/MV switchgears and LV high power busbar trunking (<6300A) in power substations, commercial buildings and industry fascilities. Professional in AutoCAD programming. Present on

7 Comments


  1. Sandeep Singh
    Sep 08, 2018

    I need weekly updates


  2. Hocine Meng Fodil
    Sep 06, 2018

    the nomenclature or the element of doing the job is not clear as the theory is given but it is now some how clear for me thank you


  3. Hocine Meng Fodil
    Sep 06, 2018

    This article is very important for me because concerning the theoritical analysis is ok but the instrument or the nomenclature of the element sensitive can say not very clear or situated


  4. Mohammed Azam
    Sep 06, 2018

    Nice Information Mr. Edwards


  5. Ataur Rahman
    Sep 06, 2018

    As always, this article by Mr. Edward is very informative. Thank you.


  6. Venkat Iyer
    Sep 05, 2018

    Cheers …. beautiful explanations.

    I have a query and can it be raised here?

    Regards


  7. Munir
    Sep 05, 2018

    Very informative Article Edvard. Cheers

Leave a Comment

Tell us what you're thinking... we care about your opinion!

Premium Membership

Get access to premium electrical guides, technical articles and much more!