Premium Membership ♕

CYBER WEEK OFFER 💥 Save 20% on PRO Membership Plan and Video Courses with the coupon CYM23 (Expires in 2 days).

Home / Technical Articles / How reactive power is helpful to maintain a system healthy

Reactive power

We always in practice to reduce reactive power to improve system efficiency. This are acceptable at some level, if system is purely resistively or capacitance it make cause some problem in Electrical system. AC systems supply or consume two kind of power: real power and reactive power.

How reactive power is helpful to maintain a system healthy
How reactive power is helpful to maintain a system healthy (on photo: Medium voltage power factor correction panel; credit:

Real power accomplishes useful work while reactive power supports the voltage that must be controlled for system reliability. Reactive power has a profound effect on the security of power systems because it affects voltages throughout the system.

Find important discussion regarding importance about Reactive Power and how it is useful to maintain System voltage healthy.


Need of Reactive Power

  • Voltage control in an electrical power system is important for proper operation for electrical power equipment to prevent damage such as overheating of generators and motors, to reduce transmission losses and to maintain the ability of the system to withstand and prevent voltage collapse. In general terms, decreasing reactive power causing voltage to fall while increasing it causing voltage to rise. A voltage collapse occurs when the system try to serve much more load than the voltage can support.
  • When reactive power supply lower voltage, as voltage drops current must increase to maintain power supplied, causing system to consume more reactive power and the voltage drops further . If the current increase too much, transmission lines go off line, overloading other lines and potentially causing cascading failures.
  • If the voltage drops too low, some generators will disconnect automatically to protect themselves. Voltage collapse occurs when an increase in load or less generation or transmission facilities causes dropping voltage, which causes a further reduction in reactive power from capacitor and line charging, and still there further voltage reductions. If voltage reduction continues, these will cause additional elements to trip, leading further reduction in voltage and loss of the load. The result in these entire progressive and uncontrollable declines in voltage is that the system unable to provide the reactive power required supplying the reactive power demands.

Importance of Present of Reactive Power

  •  Voltage control and reactive-power management are two aspects of a single activity that both supports reliability and facilitates commercial transactions across transmission networks.
  • On an alternating-current (AC) power system, voltage is controlled by managing production and absorption of reactive power. There are three reasons why it is necessary to manage reactive power and control voltage.
  • First, both customer and power-system equipment are designed to operate within a range of voltages, usually within±5% of the nominal voltage. At low voltages, many types of equipment perform poorly; light bulbs provide less illumination, induction motors can overheat and be damaged, and some electronic equipment will not operate at. High voltages can damage equipment and shorten their lifetimes.
  • Second, reactive power consumes transmission and generation resources. To maximize the amount of real power that can be transferred across a congested transmission interface, reactive-power flows must be minimized. Similarly, reactive-power production can limit a generator’s real-power capability.
  • Third, moving reactive power on the transmission system incurs real-power losses. Both capacity and energy must be supplied to replace these losses.
  • Voltage control is complicated by two additional factors.
  • First, the transmission system itself is a nonlinear consumer of reactive power, depending on system loading. At very light loading the system generates reactive power that must be absorbed, while at heavy loading the system consumes a large amount of reactive power that must be replaced. The system’s reactive-power requirements also depend on the generation and transmission configuration.
  • Consequently, system reactive requirements vary in time as load levels and load and generation patterns change. The bulk-power system is composed of many pieces of equipment, any one of which can fail at any time. Therefore, the system is designed to withstand the loss of any single piece of equipment and to continue operating without impacting any customers. That is, the system is designed to withstand a single contingency. Taken together, these two factors result in a dynamic reactive-power requirement. The loss of a generator or a major transmission line can have the compounding effect of reducing the reactive supply and, at the same time, reconfiguring flows such that the system is consuming additional reactive power.
  • At least a portion of the reactive supply must be capable of responding quickly to changing reactive-power demands and to maintain acceptable voltages throughout the system. Thus, just as an electrical system requires real-power reserves to respond to contingencies, so too it must maintain reactive-power reserves.
  • Loads can also be both real and reactive. The reactive portion of the load could be served from the transmission system. Reactive loads incur more voltage drop and reactive losses in the transmission system than do similar-size (MVA) real loads.
  • Vertically integrated utilities often include charges for provision of reactive power to loads in their rates. With restructuring, the trend is to restrict loads to operation at near zero reactive power demand (a 1.0 power factor). The system operator proposal limits loads to power factors between 0.97 lagging (absorbing reactive power) and 0.99 leading. This would help to maintain reliability of the system and avoid the problems of market power in which a company could use its transmission lines to limit competition for generation and increase its prices.

Purpose of Reactive Power

  • Synchronous generators, SVC and various types of other DER (Distributed energy resource) equipment are used to maintain voltages throughout the transmission system. Injecting reactive power into the system raises voltages, and absorbing reactive power lowers voltages.
  • Voltage-support requirements are a function of the locations and magnitudes of generator outputs and customer loads and of the configuration of the DER transmission system.
  • These requirements can differ substantially from location to location and can change rapidly as the location and magnitude of generation and load change. At very low levels of system load, transmission lines act as capacitors and increase voltages. At high levels of load, however, transmission lines absorb reactive power and thereby lower voltages. Most transmission-system equipment (e.g., capacitors, inductors, and tap-changing transformers) is static but can be switched to respond to changes in voltage-support requirements
  • System operation has three objectives when managing reactive power and voltages.
  • First, it must maintain adequate voltages throughout the transmission and distribution system for both current and contingency conditions.
  • Second, it seeks to minimize congestion of real-power flows.
  • Third, it seeks to minimize real-power losses.
  • However, the mechanisms that system operators use to acquire and deploy reactive-power resources are changing .These mechanisms must be fair to all parties as well as effective. Further, they must be demonstrably fair.

What is Reactive Power?

  • While active power is the energy supplied to run a motor, heat a home, or illuminate an electric light bulb, reactive power provides the important function of regulating voltage.
  • If voltage on the system is not high enough, active power cannot be supplied.
  • Reactive power is used to provide the voltage levels necessary for active power to do useful work.
  • Reactive power is essential to move active power through the transmission and distribution system to the customer.

Why Do We Need Reactive Power?

  • Reactive power (VARS) is required to maintain the voltage to deliver active power (watts) through transmission lines.
  • Motor loads and other loads require reactive power to convert the flow of electrons into useful work.
  • When there is not enough reactive power, the voltage sags down and it is not possible to push the power demanded by loads through the lines.

Reactive Power is a Byproduct of Alternating Current (AC) Systems

  • Transformers, transmission lines, and motors require reactive power
  • Transformers and transmission lines introduce inductance as well as resistance:
    1. Both oppose the flow of current
    2. Must raise the voltage higher to push the power through the inductance of the lines
    3. Unless capacitance is introduced to offset inductance
  • The farther the transmission of power, the higher the voltage needs to be raised
  • Electric motors need reactive power to produce magnetic fields for their operation

How Are Voltages Controlled?

  • Voltages are controlled by providing sufficient reactive power control margin to “modulate” and supply needs through:
    1. Shunt capacitor and reactor compensations
    2. Dynamic compensation
    3. Proper voltage schedule of generation.
  • Voltages are controlled by predicting and correcting reactive power demand from loads

Voltage must be maintained within Acceptable Levels

  • Under normal system conditions, both peak or off peak load conditions, the voltages need to be maintained between 95% and 105% of the nominal.
  • Low voltage conditions could result in equipment malfunctions:
    1. Motor will stall, overheat or damage
    2. Reactive power output of capacitors will be reduced exponentially
    3. Generating units may trip.
  • High voltage conditions may:
    1. Damage major equipment – insulation failure
    2. Automatically trip major transmission equipment

Voltage and Reactive Power

  • Voltage and reactive power must be properly managed and controlled to:
    1. Provide adequate service quality
    2. Maintain proper stability of the power system.

Reactive Power and Power Factor

  • Reactive power is present when the voltage and current are not in phase:
    1. One waveform leads the other
    2. Phase angle not equal to 0o
    3. Power factor less than unity
  • Measured in volt-ampere reactive (VAR)
  • Produced when the current waveform leads voltage waveform (Leading power factor)
  • Vice versa, consumed when the current waveform lags voltage (lagging power factor)

Reactive Power Limitations

  • Reactive power does not travel very far.
  • Usually necessary to produce it close to the location where it is needed
  • A supplier/source close to the location of the need is in a much better position to provide reactive power versus one that is located far from the location of the need
  • Reactive power supplies are closely tied to the ability to deliver real or active power.

Reactive power caused absence of electrical supply in country-A blackout

Power Triangle
Power Triangle

  • The quality of the electrical energy supply can be evaluated basing on a number of parameters. However, the most important will be always the presence of electrical energy and the number and duration of interrupts.
  • If there is no voltage in the socket nobody will care about harmonics, sags or surges.
  • A long term, wide-spread interrupt – a blackout leads usually to catastrophic losses. It is difficult to imagine that in all the country there is no electrical supply.
  • In reality such things have already happened a number of times. One of the reasons leading to a blackout is reactive power that went out of the control.
  • When consumption of electrical energy is high, the demand on inductive reactive power increases usually at the same proportion. In this moment, the transmission lines (that are well loaded) introduce an extra inductive reactive power.
  • The local sources of capacitive reactive power become insufficient. It is necessary to deliver more of the reactive power from generators in power plants.
  • It might happen that they are already fully loaded and the reactive power will have to be delivered from more distant places or from abroad. Transmission of reactive power will load more the lines, which in turn will introduce more reactive power. The voltage on customer side will decrease further. Local control of voltage by means of autotransformers will lead to increase of current (to get the same power) and this in turn will increase voltage drops in lines. In one moment this process can go like avalanche reducing voltage to zero. In mean time most of the generators in power plants will switch off due to unacceptably low voltage what of course will deteriorate the situation.
  • In continental Europe most of the power plant is based on heat and steam turbines. If a generation unit in such power plant is stopped and cool down it requires time and electrical energy to start operation again. If the other power plants are also off -the blackout is permanent.
  • Insufficient reactive power leading to voltage collapse has been a causal factor in major blackouts in the worldwide. Voltage collapse occurred in United States in the blackout of July 2, 1996, and August10, 1996 on the West Coast.
  • While August 14, 2003, blackout in the United States and Canada was not due to a voltage collapse as that term has traditionally used by power system engineers, the task force final report said that” Insufficient reactive power was an issue in the blackout” and the report also “overestimation of dynamics reactive output of system generation ” as common factor among major outages in the United States.
  • Demand for reactive power was unusually high because of a large volume of long-distance transmissions streaming through Ohio to areas, including Canada, than needed to import power to meet local demand. But the supply of reactive power was low because some plants were out of service and, possibly, because other plants were not producing enough of it.

Problems of reactive power

  • Though reactive power is needed to run many electrical devices, it can cause harmful effects on your appliances and other motorized loads, as well as your electrical infrastructure. Since the current flowing through your electrical system is higher than that necessary to do the required work, excess power dissipates in the form of heat as the reactive current flows through resistive components like wires, switches and transformers. Keep in mind that whenever energy is expended, you pay. It makes no difference whether the energy is expended in the form of heat or useful work.
  • We can determine how much reactive power your electrical devices use by measuring their power factor, the ratio between real power and true power. A power factor of 1 (i.e. 100%) ideally means that all electrical power is applied towards real work. Homes typically have overall power factors in the range of 70% to 85%, depending upon which appliances may be running. Newer homes with the latest in energy efficient appliances can have an overall power factor in the nineties.
  • The typical residential power meter only reads real power, i.e. what you would have with a power factor of 100%. While most electric companies do not charge residences directly for reactive power, it’s a common misconception to say that reactive power correction has no economic benefit. To begin with, electric companies correct for power factor around industrial complexes, or they will request the offending customer to do so at his expense, or they will charge more for reactive power. Clearly electric companies benefit from power factor correction, since transmission lines carrying the additional (reactive) current to heavily industrialized areas costs them money. Many people overlook the benefits that power factor correction can offer the typical home in comparison to the savings and other benefits that businesses with large inductive loads can expect.
  • Most importantly, you pay for reactive power in the form of energy losses created by the reactive current flowing in your home. These losses are in the form of heat and cannot be returned to the grid. Hence you pay. The fewer kilowatts expended in the home, whether from heat dissipation or not, the lower the electric bill. Since power factor correction reduces the energy losses, you save.
  • As stated earlier, electric companies correct for power factor around industrial complexes, or they will request the offending customer to do so, or they will charge for reactive power. They’re not worried about residential service because the impact on their distribution grid is not as severe as in heavily industrialized areas. However, it is true that power factor correction assists the electric company by reducing demand for electricity, thereby allowing them to satisfy service needs elsewhere. But who cares? Power factor correction lowers your electric bill by reducing the number of kilowatts expended, and without it your electric bill will be higher, guaranteed.
  • We’ve encountered this with other electric companies and have been successful in getting each of them to issue a retraction. Electric companies do vary greatly and many show no interest in deviating from their standard marketing strategy by acknowledging proven energy saving products. Keep in mind that promoting REAL energy savings to all their customers would devastate their bottom line.
  • Power factor correction will not raise your electric bill or do harm to your electrical devices. The technology has been successfully applied throughout industry for years. When sized properly, power factor correction will enhance the electrical efficiency and longevity of inductive loads. Power factor correction can have adverse side effects (e.g. harmonics) on sensitive industrialized equipment if not handled by knowledgeable, experienced professionals. Power factor correction on residential dwellings is limited to the capacity of the electrical panel (200 amp max) and does not over compensate household inductive loads. By increasing the efficiency of electrical systems, energy demand and its environmental impact is lessened.

Profound effects of Reactive Power in Various elements of Power System:


  • An electric-power generator’s primary function is to convert fuel (or other energy resource) into electric power. Almost all generators* also have considerable control over their terminal voltage and reactive-power output.
  • Payment for the use of this resource is the specific focus of  voltage control from generation service. The ability of   generator to provide reactive support depends on its real-power production. Like most electric equipment, generators are limited by their current-carrying capability. Near rated voltage, this capability becomes an MVA limit for the armature of the generator rather than a MW limitation.
  • Production of reactive power involves increasing the magnetic field to raise the generator’s terminal voltage. Increasing the magnetic field requires increasing the current in the rotating field winding. Absorption of reactive power is limited by the magnetic-flux pattern in the stator, which results in excessive heating of the stator-end iron, the core-end heating limit.
  • The synchronizing torque is also reduced when absorbing large amounts of reactive power, which can also limit generator capability to reduce the chance of losing synchronism with the system.
  • The generator prime mover (e.g., the steam turbine) is usually designed with less capacity than the electric generator, resulting in the prime-mover limit. The designers recognize that the generator will be producing reactive power and supporting system voltage most of the time. Providing a prime mover capable of delivering all the mechanical power the generator can convert to electricity when it is neither producing nor absorbing reactive power would result in underutilization of the prime mover.
  • To produce or absorb additional VARs beyond these limits would require a reduction in the real-power output of the unit. Control over the reactive output and the terminal voltage of the generator is provided by adjusting the DC current in the generator’s rotating field .Control can be automatic, continuous, and fast.
  • The inherent characteristics of the generator help maintain system voltage. At any given field setting, the generator has a specific terminal voltage it is attempting to hold. If the system voltage declines, the generator will inject reactive power into the power system, tending to raise system voltage. If the system voltage rises, the reactive output of the generator will drop, and ultimately reactive power will flow into the generator, tending to lower system voltage. The voltage regulator will accentuate this behavior by driving the field current in the appropriate direction to obtain the desired system voltage.

Synchronous condesers

  • Every synchronous machine (motor or generator) with a controllable field has the reactive-power capabilities discussed above.
  • Synchronous motors are occasionally used to provide dynamic voltage support to the power system as they provide mechanical power to their load. Some combustion turbines and hydro units are designed to allow the generator to operate without its mechanical power source simply to provide the reactive-power capability to the power system when the real-power generation is unavailable or not needed.
  • Synchronous machines that are designed exclusively to provide reactive support are called synchronous condensers.
  • Synchronous condensers have all of the response speed and controllability advantages of generators without the need to construct the rest of the power plant (e.g., fuel-handling equipment and boilers). Because they are rotating machines with moving parts and auxiliary systems, they may require significantly more maintenance than static alternatives. They also consume real power equal to about 3% of the machine’s reactive-power rating.

Capacitors and inductors

  • Capacitors and inductors (which are sometimes called reactors) are passive devices that generate or absorb reactive power. They accomplish this without significant real-power losses or operating expense. The output of capacitors and inductors is proportional to the square of the voltage. Thus, a capacitor bank (or inductor) rated at 100 MVAR will produce (or absorb) only 90 MVAR when the voltage dips to 0.95 pu but it will produce (or absorb) 110 MVAR when the voltage rises to 1.05 pu. This relationship is helpful when inductors are employed to hold voltages down.
  • The inductor absorbs more when voltages are highest and the device is needed most. The relationship is unfortunate for the more common case where capacitors are employed to support voltages. In the extreme case, voltages fall, and capacitors contribute less, resulting in a further degradation in voltage and even less support from the capacitors; ultimately, voltage collapses and outages occur.
  • Inductors are discrete devices designed to absorb a specific amount of reactive power at a specific voltage. They can be switched on or off but offer no variable control.
  • Capacitor banks are composed of individual capacitor cans, typically 200 kVAR or less each. The cans are connected in series and parallel to obtain the desired capacitor-bank voltage and capacity rating. Like inductors, capacitor banks are discrete devices but they are often configured with several steps to provide a limited amount of variable control which makes it a disadvantage compared to synchronous motor.

Static VAR compensators (SVCs)

  •  An SVC combines conventional capacitors and inductors with fast switching capability. Switching takes place in the sub cycle time frame (i.e., in less than 1/60 of a second), providing a continuous range of control. The range can be designed to span from absorbing to generating reactive power. Consequently, the controls can be designed to provide very fast and effective reactive support and voltage control. Because SVCs use capacitors, they suffer from the same degradation in reactive capability as voltage drops. They also do not have the short-term overload capability of generators and synchronous condensers. SVC applications usually require harmonic filters to reduce the amount of harmonics injected into the power system.

Static synchronous compensators (STATCOMs)

  • The STATCOM is a solid-state shunt device that generates or absorbs reactive power and is one member of a family of devices known as flexible AC transmission system (FACTS).
  • The STATCOM is similar to the SVC in response speed, control capabilities, and the use of power electronics. Rather than using conventional capacitors and inductors combined with fast switches, however, the STATCOM uses power electronics to synthesize the reactive power output. Consequently, output capability is generally symmetric, providing as much capability for production as absorption.
  •  The solid-state nature of the STATCOM means that, similar to the SVC, the controls can be designed to provide very fast and effective voltage control. While not having the short-term overload capability of generators and synchronous condensers, STATCOM capacity does not suffer as seriously as SVCs and capacitors do from degraded voltage.
  • STATCOMs are current limited so their MVAR capability responds linearly to voltage as opposed to the voltage squared relationship of SVCs and capacitors. This attribute greatly increases the usefulness of STATCOMs in preventing voltage collapse.

Distributed generation

  • Distributing generation resources throughout the power system can have a beneficial effect if the generation has the ability to supply reactive power. Without this ability to control reactive-power output, performance of the transmission and distribution system can be degraded. Induction generators were an attractive choice for small, grid-connected generation, primarily because they are relatively inexpensive. They do not require synchronizing and have mechanical characteristics that are appealing for some applications (wind, for example). They also absorb reactive power rather than generate it, and are not controllable. If the output from the generator fluctuates (as wind does), the reactive demand of the generator fluctuates as well, compounding voltage-control problems for the transmission system. Induction generators can be compensated with static capacitors, but this strategy does not address the fluctuation problem or provide controlled voltage support. Many distributed generation resources are now being coupled to the grid through solid-state power electronics to allow the prime mover’s speed to vary independently of the power-system frequency. For wind, this use of solid-state electronics can improve the energy capture.
  • For gas-fired micro turbines, power electronics equipment allows them to operate at very high speeds. Photovoltaic’s generate direct current and require inverters to couple them to the power system. Energy-storage devices (e.g., batteries, flywheels, and superconducting magnetic-energy storage devices) are often distributed as well and require solid-state inverters to interface with the grid. This increased use of a solid-state interface between the devices and the power system has the added benefit of providing full reactive-power control, similar to that of a STATCOM.
  • In fact, most devices do not have to be providing active power for the full range of reactive control to be available. The generation prime mover, e.g. turbine, can be out of service while the reactive component is fully functional. This technological development (solid-state power electronics) has turned a potential problem into a benefit, allowing distributed resources to contribute to voltage control.

Transmission side

  • Unavoidable consequence of loads operation is presence of reactive power, associated with phase shifting between voltage and current.
  • Some portion of this power is compensated on customer side, while the rest is loading the network. The supply contracts do not require a cosφ equal to one. The reactive power is also used by the transmission lines owner for controlling the voltages.
  • Reactive component of current adds to the loads current and increases the voltage drops across network impedances. Adjusting the reactive power flow the operator change voltage drops in lines and in this way the voltage at customer connection point. The voltage on customer side depends on everything what happens on the way from generator to customer loads. All nodes, connation points of other transmission lines, distribution station and other equipment contribute to reactive power flow.
  • A transmission line itself is also a source of reactive power. A line that is open on the other end (without load) is like a capacitor and is a source of capacitive (leading) reactive power. The lengthwise inductances without current are not magnetized and do not introduce any reactive components.
  • On the other hand, when a line is conducting high current, the contribution of the lengthwise inductances is prevalent and the line itself becomes a source of inductive (lagging) reactive power. For each line can be calculated a characteristic value of power flow Sk.
  •  If the transmitted power is above Sk, the line will introduce additionally inductive reactive power, and if it is below Sk, the line will introduce capacitive reactive power. The value of Sk depends on the voltage: for 400 kV line is about 32% of the nominal transmission power, for 220 kV line is about 28% and for 110 kV line is about 22%. The percentage will vary accordingly to construction parameters.
  • The reactive power introduced by the lines themselves is really a nuisance for the transmission system operator. In the night, when the demand is low it is necessary to connect parallel reactors for consuming the additional capacitive reactive power of the lines. Sometimes it is necessary to switch off a low-loaded line (what definitely affect the system reliability). In peak hours not only the customer loads cause big voltage drops but also the inductive reactive power of the lines adds to the total power flow and causes further voltage drops.
  • The voltage and reactive power control has some limitations. A big part of reactive power is generated in power plant unites. The generators can deliver smoothly adjustable leading and lagging reactive power without any fuel costs.
  • However, the reactive power occupies the generation capacity and reduces the active power production. Furthermore, it is not worth to transmit reactive power for long distance (because of active power losses). Control provided “on the way” in transmission line, connation nodes, distribution station and other points requires installation of capacitors or\and reactors.
  • They are often used with transformer tap changing system. The range of voltage control depends on their size. The control may consist e.g. in setting the transformer voltage higher and then reducing it by reactive currents flow.
  •  If the transformer voltage reaches the highest value and all capacitors are in operation, the voltage on customer side cannot be further increase. On the other hand when a reduction is required the limit is set by maximal reactive power of reactors and the lowest tap of transformer.

Voltage and reactive power planning and assessment practices

(1) Key Principles:

  • Reactive power cannot be transmitted over a long distance or through power transformers due to excessive reactive power losses.
  • Reactive power supply should be located in close proximity to its consumption.
  • Sufficient static and dynamic voltage support is needed to maintain voltage levels within an acceptable range.
  • Sufficient reactive power reserves must be available to regulate voltage at all time

(2) Key Implications:

  • Metering must be in place and maintained to capture actual reactive consumption at various points.
  • Transmission and Distribution planners must determine in advance the required type and location of reactive correction.
  • Reactive power devices must be maintained and functioning properly to ensure the correct amount of reactive compensation.
  • Distribution reactive loads must be fully compensated before transmission reactive compensation is considered.

(3) Transmitting Reactive Power

  • Reactive power cannot be effectively transmitted across long distances or through power transformers due to high I2X losses
  • Reactive power should be located in close proximity to its consumption.

(4) Static vs. Dynamic Voltage Support

  • The type of reactive compensation required is based on the time needed for voltage recovery.
  • Static Compensation is ideal for second and minute responses. (Capacitors, reactors, tap changes).
  • Dynamic Compensation is ideal for instantaneous responses. (condensers, generators)
  • A proper balance of static and dynamic voltage support is needed to maintain voltage levels within an acceptable range.

(5) Reactive Reserves during Varying Operating Conditions

  • Ideally, the system capacitors, reactors, and condensers should be operated to supply the normal reactive load.
  • As the load increases or following a contingency, additional capacitors should be switched on or reactors removed to maintain acceptable system voltages.
  • The reactive capability of the generators should be largely reserved for contingencies on the EHV system or to support voltages during extreme system operating conditions.
  • Load shedding schemes must be implemented if a desired voltage is unattainable thru reactive power reserves.

(6) Voltage Coordination

  • The reactive sources must be coordinated to ensure that adequate voltages are maintained everywhere on the interconnected system during all possible system conditions.
  • Maintaining acceptable system voltages involves the coordination of sources and sinks which include:
    1. Plant voltage schedules
    2. Transformer tap settings
    3. Reactive device settings
    4. Load shedding schemes.
  • The consequences of uncoordinated operations would include:
    1. Increased reactive power losses
    2. A reduction in reactive margin available for contingencies and extreme light load conditions
    3. Excessive switching of shunt capacitors or reactors
    4. Increased probability of voltage collapse conditions.

(7) Voltage Schedule

  • Each power plant is requested to maintain a particular voltage on the system bus to which the plant is connected.
  • The assigned schedule will permit the generating unit to typically operate:
    1. In the middle of its reactive capability range during normal conditions
    2. At the high end of its reactive capability range during contingencies
    3. “Under excited” or absorb reactive power under extreme light load conditions.

(8) Transformer Tap Settings

  • Transformer taps must be coordinated with each other and with nearby generating station voltage schedules.
  • The transformer taps should be selected so that secondary voltages remain below equipment limits during light load conditions.

(9) Reactive Device Settings

  • Capacitors on the low voltage networks should be set to switch “on” to maintain voltages during peak and contingency conditions. And
  • “Off” when no longer required supporting voltage levels.

(10) Load Shedding Schemes

  • Load shedding schemes must be implemented as a “last resort” to maintain acceptable voltages.

(11) Voltage and Reactive Power Control

  • Requires the coordination work of all Transmission and Distribution disciplines.
  • Transmission needs to:
    1. Forecast the reactive demand and required reserve margin
    2. Plan, engineer, and install the required type and location of reactive correction
    3. Maintain reactive devices for proper compensation
    4. Maintain meters to ensure accurate data
    5. Recommend the proper load shedding scheme if necessary.
  • Distribution needs to:
    1. Fully compensate distribution loads before Transmission reactive compensation is considered
    2. Maintain reactive devices for proper compensation
    3. Maintain meters to ensure accurate data
    4. Install and test automatic under voltage load shedding schemes


  1. Samir Aganoviş,
  2.  Zoran Gajiş,
  3. Grzegorz Blajszczak- Warsaw, Poland,
  4. Gianfranco Chicco
  5. Robert P. O’Connell-Williams Power Company
  6. Harry L. Terhune-American Transmission Company,
  7. Abraham Lomi, Fernando Alvarado, Blagoy Borissov, Laurence D. Kirsch
  8. Robert Thomas,

Premium Membership

Get access to premium HV/MV/LV technical articles, electrical engineering guides, research studies and much more! It helps you to shape up your technical skills in your everyday life as an electrical engineer.
More Information

Jignesh Parmar

Jignesh Parmar has completed M.Tech (Power System Control), B.E (Electrical). He is member of Institution of Engineers (MIE), India. He has more than 20 years experience in transmission & distribution-energy theft detection and maintenance electrical projects.


  1. Kolja
    Mar 08, 2021

    Thanks for the really helpful article about reactive power. Question: I am trying to connect a distributed generator (17MW solar facility) to the regional distribution system. The utility has asked us to operate the facility at a suggested power factor of -0.89 (absorbing Vars) to help control system voltage. Our inverters can operate within this range. My question is will absorbing reactive power limit our facility’s real power output capability? (i.e., we are only compensated (paid) for real power delivered.) I understand that if we were asked to produce reactive power, then this would sacrifice the amount of real power delivered, but want to ensure this is not the case when absorbing Vars. Thanks in advance for any advice you can provide.

    • tom blair
      Apr 29, 2022

      In order to connect to the distribution system your facility owner will have signed an Interconnection Agreement. That agreement will likely specify that you must agree to operate within a voltage schedule. A power factor of -.89 is rather extreme and will cost you some income from lost MWs. Most voltage schedules will make you operate between ~.97 and .99. Check and see what the IA requires. Then check and see what other IAs with the same distribution organization have specified.

      They can ask you to operate at a power factor of -.89. But they should pay you for the lost opportunity costs of reducing your MW output.

  2. Gordon Brown
    Jan 13, 2021

    A good article but it clearly needs some additional support with regards to grammar and spelling. I know the article is several years old, however, I would be happy to re-write the article so that it can be improved for the benefit of everyone. If you would like to consider this option please get in touch with me.

  3. Mishra
    Dec 15, 2020

    Great Article. Thanks you for writing.

  4. Scott
    Sep 26, 2020

    Great article!

  5. Nasir
    Aug 08, 2020


  6. karthi
    Nov 02, 2019

    I think this is the most professional looking article about ‘Reactive power’ with a lot of grammatical mistakes.

  7. Amit gajjar
    Aug 12, 2019

    Thanks sir , very nice, V good sir

  8. M Iqbal
    Dec 11, 2018

    Dear Sir,
    Good Day.
    Your article is informative. After reading I thought to ask you for support in practical problem.

    In plant two same type of engine is installed. Control Panel Have 1020 AVR. No grid or extra source is available.

    Engine-A is running normal at 5500 kW in Auto Mode, Engine-B is started, synchronized, in Manual mode increase the Load when it become nearly half of available load i.e. on 2700 kW put Engine-B also in Auto mode to share reactive power and it does, same P.f and same reactive power.

    Now try to stop Engine-A, put in manual mode, reduce the load nearly 1800 kW now again put in Auto Mode but this time it releases KVAVr and Engine-B moving to word unity, similarly revers the practice then Engine-A Moving to words Unity.


    is there any standard limit to share the reactive load, I mean ratio like here 1800: 3900 or it will share load at any ratio?

    which Parameter/s should I see to control this problem??


    I believe it is simple to equal the PTs Secondaries or slight tuning is enough ? This behavior I never seen before ?


  9. Vamsi krishna
    Jul 31, 2018

    It’s a great article really very helpful. Thank you so much.

  10. johnson ketwan
    Jun 15, 2018


    thanks MrJignesh Parmar

    now im facing problem MVAr, power factor at my generation plant .one the engine problem
    and thank for help.

  11. S. Partheeban
    Nov 01, 2016

    This article will thoroughly confuse the engineers, who do not have much experience in reactive controls such as generator VAR control and/or SVC systems.

  12. Chhunhour YEK
    Nov 01, 2016

    Great article

  13. Hugh Meares
    Aug 24, 2016

    Helpful article but needs proof reading and language corrections at the top.

  14. Sanjoy
    Aug 17, 2016

    Excellent read.vs helpful

  15. jobmon jacob
    Jul 13, 2016

    tell about smart grid, smart metering

  16. mehdi
    Mar 07, 2016

    I information or articles about the impact of reactive power on the parameters of electric and magnetic synchronous generator want everyone can help ? ? ?
    or about the impact of reactive power on regulating protective relays .
    email : [email protected]

  17. abdessamed
    Dec 16, 2015

    thanke you mister

  18. Thijs
    Oct 27, 2015

    New to the wind and HV industry, this made me understand the whole Reactive Power a lot better than it was explained in University.
    Much appreciated,

  19. santosh kishore
    Sep 04, 2015

    sir ,
    i works in iocl . my switch yard which is recieving end of uppcl that charges by the rate of kva . i want to installation of shunt capacitor so i want to know that description of capacitor bank,cost cutting , energy saving and formulae to be used our reciving end voltage is 33kv and current is 10 A. pls guide me immediately

  20. Tawfiq BENSABER
    Jun 11, 2015

    Thank you Mr. Jignesh Parmar

  21. sam
    May 07, 2015

    sir is there any equations or relations to justify that “voltage reduces due to decrease of reactive power and vice versa”?

    • Hossein
      May 27, 2015

      These papers may be helpful: (eq. 1)
      1-“A review on voltage control methods for active distribution networks”
      2-“Voltage control techniques for electrical distribution networks including distributed generation”

  22. raju
    Feb 12, 2015

    The information provided is so much useful..Landed in a best place after many trails…
    Keep doing good..:)

  23. Satish Kr. Barnwal
    Nov 21, 2014

    Very useful & interesting

  24. rohit
    Oct 16, 2014

    too good. :)

  25. Dr Sanjay R Joshi
    Jun 24, 2014

    Following can said in the answer to the question “What is reactive power?”
    It is power associated with the net zero energy transfer over a integer multiple of cycles of supply.

    Also following is worth to note :

    In case of say, induction machine, the reactive power is responsible for the magnetic field, which is the,a must medium for energy transfer. Now this field strength has to be constant so that the machine magnetic circuit do not saturate. So the magnetic field must not get any amount energy once it is fully developed. At the same time, a continuous flow of current has to be there in order to have the flux. The flux is there as long as the current flows in the stator winding. These both can happen only if the current responsible for machine magnetization, over a cycle (to be more specific even a half cycle) , do not become a tool for transfer of energy from source to machine magnetic field. So, here there is the role of reactive power.
    Therefore. we can state that the machine operation is possible only if it draws reactive power from the source.

  26. Arifa
    Feb 24, 2014

    Very informative. I have some queries pls,
    1. Reactive power is required by some loads, so does the utility specifically generate reactive power for that purpose? i know S=P+jQ, Does generating station produce S or P?

    • Oc
      Jun 25, 2014

      It produces S, wich include P and Q.

  27. sewar
    Feb 07, 2014


  28. Tamer
    Jan 08, 2014

    first of all, the lecture is very intersting and important, thank you
    But i’ve a question. you state that “Reactive power is essential to move active power through the transmission and distribution system to the customer.”
    can you explain these part for me ??

    • Abhishek
      Mar 01, 2016

      Hello Tamer,
      Well you can see that whatever is developed at consumers end is neglected ,you know we have different appliances with different power consumption in order to vary the voltage at users end , it is necessary to control voltage .So thats the main reason we have supply reactive power .

  29. kbhuva
    Nov 01, 2011

    Is there any thumbrule for calculation of required KVAr for achieve given power factor assuming KVA constant

    • balaji
      Dec 20, 2013

      S for 4 hp we should take 1kvar

  30. krishna
    Aug 29, 2011


Leave a Reply to Amit gajjar

Tell us what you're thinking. We care about your opinion! Please keep in mind that comments are moderated and rel="nofollow" is in use. So, please do not use a spammy keyword or a domain as your name, or it will be deleted. Let's have a professional and meaningful conversation instead. Thanks for dropping by!

90  ⁄    =  nine

Learn How to Design Power Systems

Learn to design LV/MV/HV power systems through professional video courses. Lifetime access. Enjoy learning!

Subscribe to Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our Weekly Digest newsletter and receive free updates on new technical articles, video courses and guides (PDF).
EEP Academy Courses - A hand crafted cutting-edge electrical engineering knowledge