Search

Premium Membership ♕

Limited Time Offer: Save 15% on PRO Plan with discount code: LRN15 and study specialized LV/MV/HV technical articles and studies.

Home / Technical Articles / Importance of Transformer Inrush Current

Residual Flux

When a transformer is taken off-line, there will be a certain amount of residual flux that can remain in the core due to the properties of the magnetic core material.

Importance of Transformer Inrush Current
Importance of Transformer Inrush Current (on photo: Data Center Power Transformer by digitalrealtytrust @ Flickr)

The residual flux can be as much as 50 to 90% of the maximum operating flux, depending on the type of core steel. When voltage is reapplied to the transformer, the flux introduced by this source voltage will build upon that which already exists in the core.

In order to maintain this level of flux in the core, which can be well into the saturation range of the core steel, the transformer can draw current well in excess of the transformer’s rated full load current.

Depending on the transformer design, the magnitude of this current inrush can be anywhere from 3.5 to 40 times the rated full load current. The waveform of the inrush current will be similar to a sine wave, but largely skewed towards the positive or negative direction. This inrush current will experience a decay, partially due to transformer losses, which will provide a dampening effect; however, the current can remain well above rated current for many cycles.

This inrush current can have an effect on the operation of relays and fuses located in the system near the transformer.

Decent approximations of the inrush current require detailed information regarding the transformer design which may be available from the manufacturer but is not typically available to the user.

Actual inrush currents will also depend upon where in the source voltage wave the switching operations occur, the moment of opening effecting the residual flux magnitude, and the moment of closing effecting the new flux.

Resource: James H. Harlow – Harlow Engineering Associates

Premium Membership

Get access to premium HV/MV/LV technical articles, electrical engineering guides, research studies and much more! It helps you to shape up your technical skills in your everyday life as an electrical engineer.
More Information
author-pic

Edvard Csanyi

Electrical engineer, programmer and founder of EEP. Highly specialized for design of LV/MV switchgears and LV high power busbar trunking (<6300A) in power substations, commercial buildings and industry facilities. Professional in AutoCAD programming.

11 Comments


  1. Mala Reddy
    May 17, 2016

    So for we know net flux in the transformer core is constant(let Q(i don’t have flux symbol here to put,so i used Q),Due to property of core some flux is stay in it(i,e Qr=50%-90%Q).So to maintain flux Q in the core you need 10% of flux from the supply write,so to produce this flux less current write …How it will take high currents?


  2. babak
    Oct 18, 2015

    Question:
    We know residual flux exist in the core after energizing the core and this flux (magnetic field) is constant and fixed. According to Faraday’s law we need to have fluctuation magnetic fields to induec voltage on secondary but we don’t. Where that current come from?


  3. Atulkumar Chandrakant Talati
    Jun 23, 2014

    Sir, Is it advantageous to numerically calculate the maximum inrush current like ABB , very before the large power transformers installed in the electric power system


  4. Naushad Ashraf
    Jun 18, 2014

    I would like to ask one question regarding transformer. My Question is – If supply is interrupted and an inverter is connected at home, immediate in on condition the back supply of inverter or alternator effect the transformer or what is the effect of transformer ?


  5. Andrei
    Dec 21, 2013

    The residual flux is not the main cause of the transformer inrush current.
    Even when there is no residual flux (assuming magnetization curve passes through zero, i.e. no hysteresis) there will be an inrush current. For single phase transformer the worst case is to be turned on when voltage passes through zero. That is because this corresponds to maximum of flux in steady AC condition (lagging 90 degrees). Since flux cannot step from zero to maximum there will be an aperiodic component of it summed up with steady AC one (so that initially the sum is zero or indeed equal to residual flux prior to turn on). In any case when the AC component is at maximum and is the same polarity as aperiodic component their sum will be well over the saturation knee with resulting high magnetization current. The aperiodic component will decay, but that may indeed take many cycles. Consequently, If at turn on the voltage passes through maximum there will be no inrush current.
    This is easy to simulate, for example in LT SPICE.
    The possible solution to limit the inrush current is to turn on the transformer though resistor(s) then bypass them after short time.


  6. kafeel_syed
    Feb 10, 2013

    Referring ” In Rush Current Phenomena” What precautions / tests should we carry out as Commissioning Engineer’s once we Switch Off the MV Transformers for Maintenance or any Shutdown request.


    • Edis DV Power
      Feb 19, 2015

      Hello Sir. We perform demagnetization process in very simple and efficient way. The device generates the DC current, and changes the polarity of the current in every step. Also the magnitude of the DC current is decreased in every step. In this way the surface of the core hysteresis loop is decreasing and transformer core become demagnetized (minimum residual flux). The process can be easily verified with the excitation current test and the FRA test.


  7. Antonio Melgarejo
    Dec 28, 2012

    I think that the flux is starting, the ohmical characteristics is most relevant than the induction properties, until the AC voltage does not describe a pair of cycles at which the flow starts to be generated. It´s a pity that In not to take pictures of it handy but mentally as James H says in his commentary, is as much as 40 times the rated current, in the case of connection at the maximum positive or negative value of the sinusoid. In domestic characteristic curve magnetotermico guard has to be special for it (example welding transformers) and power electronics, software control prevents the first ten cycles (50Hz 20ms X 10 = 200ms) than the main breaker is open every time you connect the transforme, ignore this value in that moment . The funny thing is that if by chance, a breaker closes and concrete in the same time of zero crossing of the voltage, the In Rush effect is only less than 2 to 3.5 times the nominal current as he said. My question is if its possible call to this phenomenon like “the core´s inertial flux”.

Leave a Reply to Edis DV Power

Tell us what you're thinking. We care about your opinion! Please keep in mind that comments are moderated and rel="nofollow" is in use. So, please do not use a spammy keyword or a domain as your name, or it will be deleted. Let's have a professional and meaningful conversation instead. Thanks for dropping by!

  +  seventy  =  seventy nine

Learn How to Design Power Systems

Learn to design LV/MV/HV power systems through professional video courses. Lifetime access. Enjoy learning!

Subscribe to Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our Weekly Digest newsletter and receive free updates on new technical articles, video courses and guides (PDF).
EEP Academy Courses - A hand crafted cutting-edge electrical engineering knowledge