Premium Membership ♕

Save 50% on all EEP Academy courses with Enterprise Membership Plan and study specialized LV/MV/HV technical articles & guides.

Home / Technical Articles / How to achieve selective coordination of circuit breakers

Introduction to Selective Coordination

Selective coordination is often referred to simply as coordination. Coordination is defined in NEC® 240.2 as: “The proper localization of a fault condition to restrict outages to the equipment affected, accomplished by the choice of selective fault-protective devices.”

Selective Coordination with Circuit Breakers (photo credit:
Selective Coordination with Circuit Breakers (photo credit:

It is important to note that the type of overcurrent protective device selected often determines if a system is selectively coordinated.

The figure below shows the difference between a system without selective coordination and a system with selective coordination. The figure on the left shows a system without selective coordination. In this system, unnecessary power loss to unaffected loads can occur, since the device nearest the fault cannot clear the fault before devices upstream open.

The system on the right shows a selectively coordinated system.

With and without selective coordination
With and without selective coordination

Here, the fault is cleared by the overcurrent device nearest the fault before any other upstream devices open, and unnecessary power loss to unaffected loads is avoided.

Selective Coordination – NEC®

The NEC® discusses selective coordination in 240.12 and states:

Where an orderly shutdown is required to minimize the hazard(s) to personnel and equipment, a system of coordination based on the following two conditions shall be permitted:

  1. Coordinated short-circuit protection
  2. Overload indication based on monitoring system or devices.

The monitoring system may cause the condition to go to alarm, allowing corrective action or an orderly shutdown, thereby minimizing personnel hazards and equipment damage.

In addition, coordination is specifically required in health care facilities (per NEC® 517.17) and multiple elevator circuits (per NEC® 620.62).

Good design practice considers continuity of service, cost of downtime, lost worker productivity, and safety of building occupants.

Methods of Performing a Coordination Study

Two methods are most often used to perform a coordination study:

  1. Overlays of time-current curves, which utilize a light table and manufacturers’ published data.
  2. Computer programs that utilize a PC/Laptop and allow the designer to select time-current curves published by manufacturers. (For example, Schneider Electric has an excellent piece of software ‘Direct Curves‘ designed to carry out a discrimination study based on protection device tripping curves.)

Regardless of which method is used, a thorough understanding of time-current characteristic curves of overcurrent protective devices is essential to provide a selectively coordinated system.

For fuse systems, verification of selective coordination is quick and easy, merely adhere to fuse ampere rating ratios as indicated by the manufacturer.

It should be noted that the study of time-current curves indicates performance during overload and low-level fault conditions. The performance of overcurrent devices that operate under medium to high level fault conditions are not reflected on standard time-current curves. Other engineering methods must be utilized.

Selective Coordination – Circuit Breakers

The curve below shows a 90 ampere circuit breaker and an upstream 400 ampere circuit breaker with an instantaneous trip setting of 5 (5 times 400A = 2000A).

90 ampere circuit breaker and an upstream 400 ampere circuit breaker with an instantaneous trip setting of 5 (5 times 400A = 2000A)
90 ampere circuit breaker and an upstream 400 ampere circuit breaker with an instantaneous trip setting of 5 (5 times 400A = 2000A)

The minimum instantaneous unlatching current for the 400A circuit breaker could be as low as 2000A times .75 = 1500A (± 25% band). If a fault above 1500 amperes occurs on the load side of the 90 ampere breaker, both breakers could open. The 90 ampere breaker generally unlatches before the 400 ampere breaker.

However, before the 90 ampere breaker can clear the fault current, the 400 ampere breaker could have unlatched and started to open as well.

The example below illustrates this point.

Assume a 4000 ampere short-circuit exists on the load side of the 90 ampere circuit breaker. The sequence of events would be as follows:

  1. The 90 ampere breaker unlatches (Point A).
  2. The 400 ampere breaker unlatches (Point B). Once a breaker unlatches, it will open. At the unlatching point, the process is irreversible.
  3. At Point C, the 90 ampere breaker will have completely interrupted the fault current.
  4. At Point D, the 400 ampere breaker also will have completely opened.
Consequently, this is a non-selective system, causing a blackout to the other loads protected by the 400A breaker.

This is typical for molded case circuit breakers (MCCBs) due to the instantaneous trip and wide band of operation on medium to high fault conditions. In addition, this can affect other upstream molded case circuit breakers depending upon the size and the instantaneous setting of the circuit breakers upstream and the magnitude of the fault current.

Circuit Breakers with Short-Time-Delay and Instantaneous Override

Some electronic trip molded case circuit breakers (MCCB) and most insulated case circuit breakers (ICCB) offer short-time delay (STD). This allows the circuit breaker the ability to delay tripping for a period of time, typically 6 to 30 cycles.

LV circuit breaker protection settings
LV circuit breaker protection settings

However, with electronic trip molded case circuit breakers and insulated case circuit breakers, a built-in instantaneous override mechanism is present.

This is called the instantaneous override function, and will override the STD for medium to high level faults. The instantaneous override setting for these devices is typically 8 to 12 times the rating of the circuit breaker and will “kick in” for faults equal to or greater than the override setting.

Because of this instantaneous override, non-selective tripping can exist, similar to molded case circuit breakers and insulated case circuit breakers without short-time delay.

Thus, while short-time delay in molded case and insulated case circuit breakers can improve coordination in the overload and low level fault regions, it may not be able to assure coordination for medium and high level fault conditions.

Low Voltage Power Circuit Breakers (LVPCB) with Short-Time Delay

Short-time-delay, with settings from 6 to 30 cycles, is also available on low voltage power circuit breakers. However, with low voltage power circuit breakers an instantaneous override is not required. Thus, low voltage power circuit breakers with short-time delay can hold into faults for up to 30 cycles.

This allows the downstream device to open the fault before the upstream low voltage power circuit breaker opens.

However, if the fault is between the downstream device and the low voltage power circuit breaker, the electrical equipment can be subjected to unnecessarily high mechanical and thermal stress.

Reference // Electrical Plan Review – Overcurrent Protection and Devices, Short-Circuit Calculations, Component Protection, Selective Coordination, and Other Considerations – COOPER Bussmann (Download here)

Premium Membership

Get access to premium HV/MV/LV technical articles, electrical engineering guides, research studies and much more! It helps you to shape up your technical skills in your everyday life as an electrical engineer.
More Information

Edvard Csanyi

Electrical engineer, programmer and founder of EEP. Highly specialized for design of LV/MV switchgears and LV high power busbar trunking (<6300A) in power substations, commercial buildings and industry facilities. Professional in AutoCAD programming.


  1. Tarek Salem
    Nov 25, 2017

    we need full submission of selectivity study

  2. Niranjan
    Aug 25, 2015

    Hi Edward,
    Thanks for doing out a great job with EEPortal to engineers in their field of work, congrats, I have a small obligation with you to put some blog related relay configuration (27,50,51,64,87, 49) and simulation of the relay using its software through HMI and recording the feedback through relay testing with current/voltage injection through the same like Freja 300, 900 series or Omicron CPC 100, 356, etc.

Leave a Comment

Tell us what you're thinking. We care about your opinion! Please keep in mind that comments are moderated and rel="nofollow" is in use. So, please do not use a spammy keyword or a domain as your name, or it will be deleted. Let's have a professional and meaningful conversation instead. Thanks for dropping by!

  −  five  =  4

Learn How to Design Power Systems

Learn to design LV/MV/HV power systems through professional video courses. Lifetime access. Enjoy learning!

Subscribe to Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our Weekly Digest newsletter and receive free updates on new technical articles, video courses and guides (PDF).
EEP Academy Courses - A hand crafted cutting-edge electrical engineering knowledge