Premium Membership ♕

Save 50% on all EEP Academy courses with Enterprise Membership Plan and study specialized LV/MV/HV technical articles & guides.

Home / Technical Articles / Talking about HV shunt reactor switching (1)

HV shunt reactor switching

These notes aim to give basic idea of the main criticalities related to HV shunt reactor switching, particularly in terms of voltage, and how such problems are faced and solved by modern switching technology.

Talking about HV shunt reactor switching
Talking about HV shunt reactor switching (on photo: Magnetically controlled shunt reactor; credit:


  1. Shunt reactors application
  2. Closing operation
  3. Opening operation (in next part)
  4. Conclusions (in next part)

Shunt reactors application

Three-phase shunt reactors are basically aimed to compensate excess of reactive power generation so preventing unacceptable voltage rise and power losses.

Lightly loaded1, long power transmission lines over 220kV, or cables 100kV and higher, are capacitive loads causing voltage increase because of the line charging currents flowing through the line / cable self inductance (Ferranti effect).

In this cases the reactor is switched on and off during the day depending on the load, only. In fact, due to the need of reactive power consumption for voltage control and electrical system safety, the shunt reactor should be never tripped: in case of reactor fault, the whole line is tripped.

1 As a reference value, it should be considered as “light” a load less than 70% of the surge impedance loading (SIL). For instance, a 345kV line with surge impedence 350Ω has about 3452/350 = 340MW SIL.

That is consistent with the fact that in some EHV lines permanently under-loaded, fixed reactors are installed (provided just with a disconnecting switch in presence of redundant shunt reactors, for maintenance purposes).

Another example of shunt reactor application is in presence of filter banks acting as capacitors at power frequency: that is the typical situation of HVDC converter station. HVDC converters produce harmonic distortion that need proper filter design to avoid heavy impact on network power quality.

Different combination of filters could be are foreseen in different load conditions to get the target value of THD. At the same time filters’ capacitor banks act also as a reactive power source providing the needed Mvar to the converter, which is an important inductive load. Sometimes it could happen that specific combinations of converter load and filters configuration can satisfy the harmonic constraints, but lead to the reactive power generated by filters exceeding that consumed by converter over acceptable level: in that situations a shunt reactor is used.

The configuration of shunt reactors may be various (bank of single-phase reactors, three-phase unit with a 3- or 5-legged core, etc.) , but following considerations still remain valid.

It is to be noted that shunt reactor is, by definition, a reactor directly connected to the network; in some applications reactors are applied through a transformer (e.g. connected to tertiary winding); in both cases the principle is the same and the reactor acts as a linear inductance2 , but this paper refers to the first.

On the other hand, despite the different possible earthing methods (isolated, solidly earthed or earthed through neutral reactor), solidly earthed three-phase shunt reactors will be considered.

2 In case of iron core reactors, linearity is obtained with integrated air gaps.

Go to Content ↑

Closing operation

For what concerns the closing operation, the shunt reactor can be simply modeled as an inductance in series with a resistance. The latter is always present, despite the effort to minimize losses.

Shunt reactor closing operation scheme
Shunt reactor closing operation scheme

Energy stored in the inductor before circuit breaker closing is zero, and network voltage is:

Network voltage

The current flowing in the circuit is then:

The current flowing in the circuit


Shunt reactor closing operation formulae

The way to cancel the transient term is to close the circuit breaker when the steady state component of current is zero (γ = φ). More simply, suppose and resistive part of the reactor impedance be zero (φ = 90°): the transient part of current is zero if the circuit breaker is switched on when the voltage
reaches its maximum value (γ = 90°).

On the contrary, the transient term will be maximum if the circuit breaker closes with γ = φ ±90°. In the simplified example that means γ = 0.

As the two terms (transient and steady state) sum each other, half a cycle later, when they have the same sign, the current increases over the steady state maximum value. The actual value depends on the circuit damping. Very low damping circuits (it is almost the case of shunt reactors) can see a current doubled, compared with the steady state.

In three phase circuits, with three-pole operated circuit breakers it is quite easy to meet a critical closing instant on at least one phase.

Because of above mentioned asymmetry in the transient current trend, closing operation can also generate zero sequence currents. Despite of the linear design of shunt reactors, in case of their switching in at the worst instant (phase voltage equal to zero), the flux will increase with the voltage-time-area during the first half-cycle to a value twice the maximum flux in normal operation.

The current is proportional to the flux density, until reactor core saturation occurs. Above the point of saturation the current will increase faster than the flux. Saturation will be present in different amount in the three phases, because of the three-phases voltage 120° displacement.

That means the sum of DC components in the three phase currents will not be null, so producing a zero sequence current which could lead to nuisance tripping by protections.

The way to mitigate the high inrush currents and generally, the switching transients, due to random closing instants is to control the making instant for each pole of the circuit breaker. That means a single-pole operated circuit breaker is needed together with a Controlled Switching Device (CSD).

Several manufacturers offer their own models of CSD: basically the principle is the same and it is based on the measuring of voltage upstream the circuit breaker, on the source side. In several cases a current feedback signal is used for adaptation control: as the switching times can be affected by temperature, auxiliary voltage variations, mechanical contingencies, etc. a deviation from target instant can occur. Such deviation is detected and properly taken into consideration during the next operation.

Go to Content ↑

Continue reading 2nd part of this article

  1. “Live Tank CB Application Guide” – ABB
  2. “Buyers Guide HV Live Tank Circuit Breakers Ed5 en” – ABB
  3. “Trasmissione e distribuzione dell’energia elettrica” – N. Faletti, P. Chizzolini
  4. “Switching Shunt Reactors” – Roy W Alexander, NeilA. McCord P.E.
  5. “HV shunt reactor secrets for protection engineers”- Zoran Gajić, Birger Hillström, Fahrudin Mekić

Premium Membership

Get access to premium HV/MV/LV technical articles, electrical engineering guides, research studies and much more! It helps you to shape up your technical skills in your everyday life as an electrical engineer.
More Information

Nicola Dieta

Electrical Engineer from Italy. Experience in power plants electrical systems, as technical coordinator. Now dealing with High Voltage systems.


  1. sonam ongchuk lepcha
    Apr 30, 2017

    Thank you everyone for sharing your knowledge to us

    Feb 09, 2015

    excellent website for engg. students like me
    keep it up!!!!

  3. Er.K.K.Murty
    Mar 20, 2014

    In the Tech Article “Talking About HV Shunt Reactor Switching (part 1)posted on 29th July2013posted by NICOLA HV transmission and Distribution ” Lightly loaded, long power transmission lines over 220kV, or cables 100kV and higher, are capacitive loads causing voltage increase because of the line charging currents flowing through the line / cable self inductance (Ferranti effect).
    Please Note: Ferranti Effect is due to the Capacitance and the line charging current of idly or lightly loaded Transmission lines 220kV and above which causes this /similarly too in case of Cables of 100kV and above ,whereas it is shown as “inductance(Ferranti effect)”.This may please be got corrected.
    From Er.K.K.Murty, Jabalpur-INDIA

  4. naveed waxir
    Mar 07, 2014

    Dis site z just like feeder full ov producrive it

  5. franz
    Feb 06, 2014

    I am learning much more in your website compared to what I am learning in my workplace and the internet combined.

    This site is wonderful!

    Jan 15, 2014

    Thanks to all this so greatest work you are doing. Specially “my daily dose”.

    I would like to ask you pleas, about a tranfomator’s resonance, and what a normalize value defined by a standars of TR 3MVA. With a supply power at 22kv/6, 3Kv?.
    Good like
    Best regards

  7. mayur joshi
    Sep 27, 2013

    A lots of thanks and admiration for your efforts.!!!!!

  8. ravicharan
    Sep 05, 2013


  9. Ahmad Al-Sheikh
    Aug 01, 2013

    wonderful article,

    • Nicola
      Aug 01, 2013

      pleased you appreciated it.

Leave a Comment

Tell us what you're thinking. We care about your opinion! Please keep in mind that comments are moderated and rel="nofollow" is in use. So, please do not use a spammy keyword or a domain as your name, or it will be deleted. Let's have a professional and meaningful conversation instead. Thanks for dropping by!

seventeen  −    =  sixteen

Learn How to Design Power Systems

Learn to design LV/MV/HV power systems through professional video courses. Lifetime access. Enjoy learning!

Subscribe to Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our Weekly Digest newsletter and receive free updates on new technical articles, video courses and guides (PDF).
EEP Academy Courses - A hand crafted cutting-edge electrical engineering knowledge
The Electrical Digital Twin Webinar