Premium Membership

Study specialized technical articles, papers & courses in low/high voltage areas. Save 50% on all courses with the Enterprise Plan.

Home / Technical Articles / The real truth behind household power savers
Household Power Saver
Household Power Saver - Efficent? What is the real truth?

A household power low voltage saving devices has recently received a lot of attention from both consumers and manufacturers. It is generally used in residential homes to save energy and to reduce electricity bills. It is a small device which is to be plugged in any of the AC sockets in the house (Mostly near Energy Meter). Moreover, some of the companies claim that their power savers save up to 40% of the energy.

Many people believe that the claims made by the power savers manufacturing companies are false. Almost all people who buy power savers do it to reduce their electricity bills.

Many people who have used these power savers said that they could reduce their electricity bills with the devices; however the reduction was not as much as they had expected. Moreover, they could not figure out if the reduction in electricity bills was due to the power savers or because of their efforts to reduce their electrical usage. There have been several serious discussions about the genuineness of the device.

In this note, we will try to find the real truth behind these power savers which claim to save as much as 40% of energy.

Working Principle of Power Saver as per Manufacture

A Power Saver is a device which plugs in to power socket. Apparently just by keeping the device connected it will immediately reduce your power consumption. Typical claims are savings between 25% and 40%.

It is known that the electricity that comes to our homes is not stable in nature. There are many fluctuations, raise and falls, and surges/Spikes in this current. This unstable current cannot be used by any of the household appliances. Moreover, the fluctuating current wastes the electric current from the circuit by converting electrical energy into heat energy.

This heat energy not only gets wasted to the atmosphere, but also harms the appliances and wiring circuit.

Household power saver device - Schematic diagram
Household power saver device - Schematic diagram

Power Saver stores the electricity inside of it using a system of capacitors and they release it in a smoother way to normal without the spikes. The systems also automatically remove carbon from the circuit which also encourages a smoother electrical flow. This means that we will have less power spikes. More of the electricity flowing around circuit can be used to power appliances than before.

Basically it is claimed that Power savers work on the principle of surge protection technology. Power savers work on straightening this unstable electric current to provide a smooth and constant output. The fluctuation in voltage is unpredictable and cannot be controlled. However, the power savers utilize current fluctuation to provide a usable power by acting like a filter and allowing only smooth current to pass through the circuit. Power savers use capacitors for this purpose. When there is a surge of current in the circuit, the capacitor of the power saver stores the excess current and releases it when there is a sudden drop. Thus only smooth output current comes out of the device.

Moreover, a power saver also removes any type of carbon in the system, which facilitates further smoother flow. The main advantage of power savers is not that they provide a backup system in times of low current, but that it protects the household appliances. It is known that a sudden rise in the power can destroy the electrical appliance. Thus, the power saver not only protects the appliance but also increases its life. Moreover, they also reduce the energy consumption and thus the electricity bills.

The amount of power saved by a power saver depends on the number of appliances on the electrical circuit. Also, the system takes at least a week to adapt itself fully to the circuit, before it starts showing its peak performance. The maximum amount of voltage savings will be seen in areas where in the current fluctuation is the highest.

Household Power Saver Scam Review

Power Factor Correction for residential customers (home owners) is a scam? At most, each unit is worth as an investment. Power factor correction does make sense for some commercial / industrial customers.

Many companies are promoting and advertise that their Power Saver unit are able to save domestic residential power consumption by employing an “active power factor correction” method on the supply line. The concept seems pretty impressive as the concept is true and legally accepted. But practically, we will find that it’s not feasible.

To support above statement first we need to understand three terms:

  1. Type of electrical load of house,
  2. Basic power terminology (KW, KVA, KVAR).
  3. Electrical tariff method of electricity company for household consumer and industrial consumer.

There are basically two kinds of load that exists in every house: one that is resistive like incandescent lamps, heaters etc. and the other that’s capacitive or inductive like ACs, refrigerators, computers, etc.

The power factor of a Resistive Load like toaster or ordinary incandescent light bulb is 1 (one). Devices with coils or capacitors (like pumps, fans and florescent light bulb ballasts)-Reactive Load have power factors less than one. When the power factor is less than 1, the current and voltage are out of phase. This is due to energy being stored and released into inductors (motor coil) or capacitors on every AC cycle (usually 50 or 60 times per second).

There are three terms need to be understand when dealing with alternating (AC) power.

  1. First Term is kilowatt (kW) and it represents Real power. Real power can perform work. Utility meters on the side of House measure this quantity (Real Power) and Power Company charge for it.
  2. The second term is reactive power, measured in KVAR. Unlike kW, it cannot perform work. Residential customers do not pay for KVAR, and utility meters on houses do not record it too.
  3. The third term is apparent power, referred to as KVA. By use of multi meters we can measure current and voltage and then multiply the readings together we get apparent power in VA.
Power triangle
Power triangle

Power Factor = Real Power (Watts) / Apparent Power (VA)

Therefore, Real Power (Watts) = Apparent Power × PF = Voltage × Ampere × PF.

Ideally a PF = 1, or unity, for an appliance defines a clean and a desired power consumption mostly Household Equipments (The dissipated output power becomes equal to the applied input power).

In the above formula we can see that if PF is less than 1, the amperes (current consumption) of the appliances increase, and vice verse.

With AC Resistive Load, the voltage is always in phase with the current and constitutes an ideal power factor equal to 1. However, with inductive or capacitive loads, the current waveform lags behind the voltage waveform and is not in tandem. This happens due to the inherent properties of these devices to store and release energy with the changing AC waveform, and this causes an overall distorted wave form, lowering the net PF of the appliance.

Manufacture claim that the above problem may be solved by installing a well-calculated inductor/capacitor network and switching it automatically and appropriately to correct these fluctuations. A power saver unit is designed exactly for this purpose. This correction is able to bring the level of PF very close to unity, thus improving the apparent power to a great extent. An improved apparent power would mean less CURRENT consumption by all the domestic appliances.

So far everything looks fine, but what’s the use of the above correction?

The Utility Bill Which We pay is never based on Apparent Power (KVA) but it is based on Real Power (KW). The utility bill that we pay is never for the Apparent Power- it’s for the Real Power.

By Reducing Current Consumption Does Not Reduce Power Bills of Household Consumer.

Study of Power Saver in Domestic Load

Let us try to study Household’s Reactive-Resistive Electrical Load and Voltage Spike Characteristic by example.

1. Power Saver in Reactive Load of Home

Let’s take One Example for reactive Load: A refrigerator having a rated Real Power of 100 watts at 220 V AC has a PF = 0.6. So Power=Volt X Ampere X P.F becomes 100 = 220 × A × 0.6 Therefore, A = 0.75 Ampere

Now suppose after Installing Power Saver if the PF is brought to about 0.9, the above result will now show as: 100 = 220 × A × 0.9 And A = 0.5 Ampere

In the second expression we clearly show that a reduction in current consumption by the refrigerator, but interestingly in both the above cases, the Real Power remains the same, i.e. the refrigerator continues to consume 100 watts, and therefore the utility bill remains the same. This simply proves that although the PF correction done by an energy saver may decrease the Amperage of the appliances, it can never bring down their power consumption and the electric Bill amount.

Reactive power is not a problem for a Reactive Load of Home appliances like A.C, Freeze, motor for its operation. It is a problem for the electric utility company when they charge for KW only. If two customers both use the same amount of real energy but one has a power factor of 0.5, then that customer also draws double the current. This increased current requires the Power Company to use larger transformers, wiring and related equipment.

To recover these costs Power Company charged a Penalty to industrial customers for their Low power factors and give them benefits if they improve their Power Factor in. Residential customers (homes) are never charged extra for their reactive Power.

2. Power Saver in Resistive Load of Home

Since a resistive load does not carry a PF so there is not any issue regarding filtering of Voltage and Current, So Power = Voltage X Current.

3. In Voltage Spike / Fluctuation condition of Household Appliances

In above discussion simply proves that as long as the voltage and the current are constant, the consumed power will also be constant. However, if there’s any rise in the input voltage because of a fluctuation, then as explained above your appliances will be forced to consume a proportionate amount of power. This becomes more apparent because current, being a function of voltage, also rises proportionately. However, this rise in the power consumption will be negligibly small; the following simple math will prove this.

Consider a bulb consuming 100 watts of power at 220 volts. This simply means at 240 volts it will use up about 109 watts of power. The rise is just of around 9% and since such fluctuations are pretty seldom, this value may be furthermore reduced to less than 1%, and that is negligible.

Thus the above discussions convincingly prove that energy savers can never work and the concept is not practically feasible.

What happens when Power Saver is installed?

The Fig shows the result of using Power Saver. The air conditioner (which has a large compressor motor) is still consuming reactive power but it is being supplied by a nearby capacitor (which is what is in those “KVAR” boxes). If you were to mount it at the air conditioner and switch it on with the air conditioner plus you sized the capacitor perfectly, then there would be no reactive power on the line going back to the fuse panel.

If the wire between your fuse panels is very long and undersized, reducing the current would result in it running cooler and having a higher voltage at the air conditioner. These savings due to cooler wiring is minimal.

What happens when Power Saver is installed
What happens when Power Saver is installed

A further complication is that if you install the “KVAR” unit at the fuse panel, it does nothing for the heat losses except for the two feet of huge wire between the fuse panel and the utility meter. Many KVAR units are marketed as boxes that you install at a single location.

If your power factor box is too large, then it will be providing reactive power for something else, perhaps your neighbor.


Power factor correction devices improve power quality but do not generally improve energy efficiency (meaning they would not reduce your energy bill). There are several reasons why their energy efficiency claims could be exaggerated.

First, residential customers are not charged for KVA – hour usage, but by kilowatt-hour usage. This means that any savings in energy demand will not directly result in lowering a residential user’s utility bill.

Second, the only potential for real power savings would occur if the product were only put near in the circuit while a reactive load (such as a motor) were running, and taken out of the circuit when the motor is not running. This is impractical, given that there are several motors in a typical home that can come on at any time (refrigerator, air conditioner, HVAC blower, vacuum cleaner, etc.), but the Power Saver itself is intended for permanent, unattended connection near the house breaker panel.

And certainly not in the way the manufacturers recommend that they be installed, that is, permanently connecting them at the main panel. Doing that drags the power factor capacitive when the inductive motors are off and could create some real problems with ringing voltages.

The KVAR needs to be sized perfectly to balance the inductive loads. Since our motors cycle on and off and we don’t use the air conditioner in the winter, there is no way to get it sized properly unless we have something to monitor the line and switch it on and off capacity (capacitors) as necessary.

Adding a capacitor can increase the line voltage to dangerous levels because it interacts with the incoming power transmission lines. Adding a capacitor to a line that has harmonic frequencies (created by some electronic equipment) on it can result in unwanted resonance and high currents.

For commercial facilities, power factor correction will rarely be cost-effective based on energy savings alone. The bulk of cost savings power factor correction can offer is in the form of avoided utility charges for low power factor.

Energy savings are usually below 1% and always below 3% of load, the higher percentage occurring where motors are a large fraction of the overall load of a facility. Energy savings alone do not make an installation cost effective.

Premium Membership

Get access to premium HV/MV/LV technical articles, electrical engineering guides, research studies and much more! It helps you to shape up your technical skills in your everyday life as an electrical engineer.
More Information

Jignesh Parmar

Jignesh Parmar has completed M.Tech (Power System Control), B.E (Electrical). He is member of Institution of Engineers (MIE), India. He has more than 20 years experience in transmission & distribution-energy theft detection and maintenance electrical projects.


  1. Stephenph
    May 26, 2021

    I have bought 3 energy saving plugs so will report back.

    • Mr. Tracy Malloy
      May 29, 2021

      I’m an electrician and electronics technician and I am rather surprised at the numerous significant errors in Jignesh’s write up given his alleged electrical background. He is correct that these devices are garbage and my calculation is the device could only save you $3-$5 Can or USA funds per year if it was plugged in 24/7. It has an approximately 2-3 microfarad capacitor inside which does all the savings work so these stories about saving 50-60 dollars a month are impossible unless you plug in 25 of them at a time. There is no carbon in the circuit and the case for spikes he mentions is exaggerated if he means a North American power source. The device does not store energy and use it later either and these are only a few of his numerous errors which I did not think an engineer could make. The 25-40% savings is the manufacturer’s misleading statement which is possibly referring to the lagging low power factor of split phase or shaded pole motors in the home but this device will not fully correct all of the low power factor. If you bring your power factor up to unity, then any of the additional dozens of power savers plugged in will likely consume power and increase your bill.

  2. Mark
    May 24, 2021

    I bought one of them for my apartment. Just plugged it in and forgot about it. After one month, my electric bill dropped from $128 per month to $67 per month. I don’t know what anyone else’s experience has been, but it literally saves me $60 bucks every month since I’ve had it.

    • Up
      May 31, 2021

      Are you for real are you sure it’s not from wether change

    • Mike
      May 31, 2021

      You need to relook at that. it’s impossible to save the way your electric company charges you for electricity unless you are a company with 500 employees

  3. David bennett
    May 24, 2021

    I had a 46.00 drop in my electrical billing from using these power savers.

    • Mike
      May 31, 2021

      You are ether full of shit or a dum ass

  4. Butch Silvercloud
    May 23, 2021

    Somewhat truthful article. Power savers… all of them, are a scam, so don’t waste your money. What bothered me about this article is the idea that the savers can, or might, remove CARBON. That is the most outrageously ridiculous thing I’ve heard in days. Nope. There is no carbon to remove in the first place… where is the carbon? Show me the Carbon? Sheesh… dumb, dumb, dumb. Anyhow, power savers are a scam and I’m spending time going after the jerks who make, promote and sell them. I’m coming for the jerks on the planet… with no mercy, none.

    • Mike
      May 31, 2021

      How much was your bill to begin with

  5. Robert H. Cooper
    May 17, 2021

    There are significant cost reductions for Power Factor improvement if the billing structure penalizes for P.F. of less than one. These situations occur in industrial situations where there are heavy inductive machinery loads.

  6. Paul Waygood
    May 16, 2021

    Have two voltex units. No savings. No proper CE mark TOTAL SCAM

  7. Nancy MacLennan
    May 11, 2021

    I purchased 3 voltex electricity spike buster but none of them are showing a green light strip that is lit when plugged in . PLEASE ADVISE WHAT I SHOULD DO. THANKS.

    • DJ Mean Al
      May 12, 2021

      What should you do? Well, let me tell you…
      You should throw them immediately in the BIN, where they belong!!

      These devices are a scam. Sorry to say Nancy, but you have been conned.

    • Adrian Waygood
      May 20, 2021

      Nothing! It doesn’t matter. They don’t work: they are a scam. Whether the light is on or off is irrelevant.

    • W L Thomson
      May 27, 2021

      Install them at the bottom of your trash can, where they can absorb carbon from your burnt toast.

    • Mike
      May 31, 2021

      Get your money back if you can. Even if the light comes on it is impossible for them to save you more then 2 to 3 cent a month if you’re lucky.

  8. Marion Campbell
    May 10, 2021

    Would one of these devices reduce effects in sound equipment, such as buzz or hiss?

    • Mike
      May 31, 2021

      No they will not and they can’t save you money!!!!!!!

  9. Tom Cunningham
    May 08, 2021

    I note that marketing for these devices is full of phrases like “you may save” or “as much as” which are red flags that at best, the devices are engineered for averages, and with the wide variety of devices in homes as well as types and size of residences, it is very unlikely that any one person will see any significant difference. My power bills vary from month to month based on temperature, how much I am home to run appliances, and many other factors making it very difficult to determine actual savings.
    It’s also interesting that one of the vendors chooses to advertise next to this article.

  10. Terry O'Keefe
    May 07, 2021

    They both can’t be right!!! John
    MAY 06, 2021
    I can’t understand how “M.Tech (Power System Control), B.E (Electrical), member of Institution of Engineers (MIE), who has more than 13 years experience in transmission & distribution-energy theft detection and maintenance electrical projects.” doesn’t know Ohm’s low.)))
    The power is proportional to square of voltage, so the 100W bulb consumes 19% more power at 240 v than at 220V, i.e. 119W, and not 109W.
    Saying so, – people who left all those positive reviews and claiming dozens of percent of bills reduction from using anything plugged into a power socket, either never studied in the school or not real people but rather “Power saver” manufacturers with fake comments.)) Michael Probasco
    MAY 03, 2021
    Your analysis is BS! I am an EE, AE, Masters. I put these in my home and save 30%. Are you part of the new world Oder or the cabal. These devices are outstanding!

  11. John
    May 06, 2021

    I can’t understand how “M.Tech (Power System Control), B.E (Electrical), member of Institution of Engineers (MIE), who has more than 13 years experience in transmission & distribution-energy theft detection and maintenance electrical projects.” doesn’t know Ohm’s low.)))
    The power is proportional to square of voltage, so the 100W bulb consumes 19% more power at 240 v than at 220V, i.e. 119W, and not 109W.
    Saying so, – people who left all those positive reviews and claiming dozens of percent of bills reduction from using anything plugged into a power socket, either never studied in the school or not real people but rather “Power saver” manufacturers with fake comments.))

  12. matthew
    May 06, 2021

    i was wondering if this device really work voltex is worth the money

    • Nick Ireland
      May 18, 2021

      I do not understand how anything, plugged in after the electricity has come through the meter, can feed back to it to reduce the reading.

    • Matthew
      May 31, 2021

      No matt they are not Worth the money. It is impossible for them to save you more then 2 to 3 cents on you bill if you are lucky.

  13. Michael Probasco
    May 03, 2021

    Your analysis is BS! I am an EE, AE, Masters. I put these in my home and save 30%. Are you part of the new world Oder or the cabal. These devices are outstanding!

    • Frankie
      May 25, 2021

      haha you just sounds like a professor doesn’t believe you got cheated.

  14. Michael Probasco
    May 03, 2021

    Your analysis sounds good to you, but is BS! I put the system in my home and am experiencing a 30% reduction in electric bills. I took EE in college. You might want to relook at your analysis. Cheers!

    • Harold Harkonen
      May 10, 2021

      Hahaha Michael Probasco, You are a *****, go back to high school to learn what a watt is!

    • Adrian Waygood
      May 20, 2021

      Well, Michael, you must have missed the lesson on power factor improvement.

  15. robert
    Apr 30, 2021

    If it sounds too good to be true……it is !

    • matthew
      May 06, 2021

      i was wondering if this device really work voltex is worth the money

Leave a Comment

Tell us what you're thinking. We care about your opinion! Please keep in mind that comments are moderated and rel="nofollow" is in use. So, please do not use a spammy keyword or a domain as your name, or it will be deleted. Let's have a professional and meaningful conversation instead. Thanks for dropping by!

seven  +  three  =  

Learn to Design Power Systems

Learn to design LV/MV/HV power systems through professional video courses. Lifetime access. Enjoy learning!

Subscribe to Newsletter

Subscribe to our Weekly Digest newsletter and receive free updates on new technical articles, video courses and electrical guides.