Power transformers connected directly to generators can experience excitation and short-circuit conditions beyond the requirements defined by ANSI/IEEE standards. Special design considerations may be necessary to ensure that a power transformer is capable of withstanding the abnormal thermal and mechanical aspects that such conditions can create.
Typical generating plants are normally designed suchthat two independent sources are required to supply the auxiliary load of each generator. Figure 1 shows a typical one-line diagram of a generating station.
- Unit transformers (UT) that are connected directly to the system
- Station service transformers (SST) that connect the system directly to the generator auxiliary load
- Unit auxiliary transformers (UAT) that connect the generator directly to the generator auxiliary load
In such a station, the UAT will typically be subjected to the most severe operational stresses. Abnormal conditions have been found to result from several occurrences in the operation of the station.
Instances of faults occurring at point F in Figure 1 – between the UAT and the breaker connecting it to the auxiliary load – are fed by two sources, both through the UT from the system and from the generator itself.
Once the fault is detected, it initiates a trip to disconnect the UT from the system and to remove the generator excitation. This loss of load on the generator can result in a higher voltage on the generator, resulting in an increased current contribution to the fault from the generator.
Alternatively, high generator-bus voltages can result from events such as generator-load rejection, resulting in overexcitation of a UAT connected to the generator bus. If a fault were to occur between the UAT and the breaker connecting it to the auxiliary load during this period of overexcitation, it could exceed the thermal and mechanical capabilities of the UAT.
Additionally, nonsynchronous paralleling of the UAT and the SST, both connected to the generator auxiliary load, can create high circulating currents that can exceed the mechanical capability of these transformers.
Considerations can be made in the design of UAT transformers to account for these possible abnormal operating conditions. Such design considerations include lowering the core flux density at rated voltage to allow for operation at higher V/Hz without saturation of the core, as well as increasing the design margin on the mechanical-withstand capability of the windings to account for the possibility of a fault occurring during a period of overexcitation.
The thermal capacity of the transformer can also be increased to prevent overheating due to increased currents.
Resource: Electric Power Transformer Engineering
I need your educational information on electrical engineering
why star point of excitation transformer is not earthed.
Where is it advised to place the UAT. At the load end or at the generating end?
The increasing of voltage that occured from fault condition. Do you mean “it come from in the transient and subtransient condition”?
no…often it become high due to load rejection on the common bus….
Hi, In this case, I have met a problem about the explosion of HV bushing at the transformer that recieves the power from the generator to the transmission system. The caused of failure came from the increasing of bushing power factor that is non-linear increasing. Therefore, this failure of the bushing are ocurred from the problem of thermal stress by fault events or not?
Your article will be useful for serving engineers. I would like to submit my comments as follows:
When fault is in between UAT and it’s breaker connecting auxiliary bus, as you said protection scheme will be to trip UT breaker and UAT breaker along with generator field breaker. In this condition fault feeding will be only because of stored energy in the generator. As generator field disconnected already there is no source to rise the voltage.