Premium Membership

Get access to premium HV/MV/LV electrical guides, technical articles, EE studies and much more.
Home / Technical Articles / What is the unit protection and why it’s widely used in transmission networks

Protection Zones

The whole power system must be protected. This is achieved by dividing it into overlapping zones. If a fault occurs in a particular zone, only the protection system covering that zone should operate. Those systems relating to other zones should not operate.

What is unit protection and why it's widely used in transmission networks
What is unit protection and why it's widely used in transmission networks

In some cases, adjacent zones may operate after a preset time-delay, to provide back up.

A protected zone is that portion of a power system protected by a given protection system or part of that protection system. Any fault occurring within a zone will cause circuit breakers in that zone to operate and trip.

When this happens, protection equipment in other zones MUST NOT operate.

Generally, there are two types of protection concepts: unit and non-unit protection. This technical article explains the first one – unit protection concept.


  1. Introduction to Unit Protection
    1. Transformer Unit Protection
    2. Pilot Unit Protection
      1. Balanced Voltage
      2. Circulating Current
    3. Digital Differential Unit Protection
    4. Phase Comparison Carrier

Introduction to Unit Protection

The boundary of operation is clearly defined in terms of primary plant. Unit protection is designed to operate for abnormal conditions inside the protected zone while remaining stable for abnormal conditions outside the protected zone.

This scheme requires current to be measured at each end of the zone. Figure 1 shows a simple unit protection scheme, while Figure 2 shows only one phase of the scheme.

Unit protection scheme
Figure 1 – Unit protection scheme

Unit protection is very simple in concept. Figure 2a shows the current transformer flows produced by a fault outside the unit protection zone. The current through the relay is zero if the two current transformers are identical.

In practice, however, the current transformers are never identical, therefore, a practical scheme requires the installation of stabilizing resistors and voltage limiting devices.

Figure 2b shows the situation for an internal fault. In this case, the current through the relay is not zero.

Relay current for external and internal fault
Figure 2 – Relay current for external and internal fault

The unit protection scheme is inexpensive, fast acting and very stable. This ideal protection is used extensively for:

  • Transformers
  • Busbars
  • Reactors
  • Capacitors
  • Lines, and
  • Generators.

A number of unit protection arrangements are examined here: transformer, line protection using pilot cable (balanced voltage and circulating current), phase comparison carrier and digital differential protection.

Go back to contents ↑

1. Transformer Unit Protection

A typical auto transformer unit protection scheme is shown in Figure 3. Each phase winding forms a three ended protected zone and the current
transformers in the low and high voltage and neutral ends of the windings are connected in parallel to form a circulating current scheme.

All current transformers are the same secondary current rating and a simple instantaneous relay can be used, (the protection is unaffected by inrush current or tap changing).

The stabilizing resistor ensures that the relay does not operate for faults outside the protected zone during the first few cycles when the current transformers may not faithfully transform the primary current.

The voltage limiting device prevents the relay from being damaged by the very large voltages which could occur due to the large current which would flow in it and the stabilizing resistor when a fault occurs in the protected zone.

Typical auto-transformer unit protection
Figure 3 – Typical auto-transformer unit protection

Go back to contents ↑

2. Pilot Unit Protection

Unit protection schemes are also used for overhead lines and underground cables, with these schemes it is more convenient to have relays at each end of the line connected by pilot cable.

For this application, the relays have both an operating winding and a restraint or bias winding. The bias winding provides stability, that is, it stops the relay operating for a through fault, while allowing operation of the relay for an internal fault. Note that a through fault occurs outside the zone of protection.

Two basic arrangements are used for pilot unit protection:

  1. Balanced voltage (see Figure 4), and
  2. Circulating current (see Figure 5).

2.1 Balanced Voltage

In Figure 4 the pilot voltages balance each other for an external fault. Most of the current flows through the restrain (bias) coil rather than the operating coil.

Balanced voltage protection
Figure 4 – Balanced voltage protection

The number of such schemes still to be found in service – for new installations it has been almost completely superseded by circulating current schemes.

It is the dual of the circulating current protection. With primary through current, the secondary e.m.f.s of the current transformers are opposed, and provide no current in the interconnecting pilot leads or the series connected relays.

An in-zone fault leads to a circulating current condition in the CT secondaries and hence to relay operation.

An immediate consequence of the arrangement is that the current transformers are in effect open-circuited, as no secondary current flows for any primary through-current conditions.

To avoid excessive saturation of the core and secondary waveform distortion, the core is provided with nonmagnetic gaps sufficient to absorb the whole primary m.m.f. at the maximum current level, the flux density remaining within the linear range.

The secondary winding therefore develops an e.m.f. and can be regarded as a voltage source. The shunt reactance of the transformer is relatively low, so the device acts as a transformer loaded with a reactive shunt; hence the name of transactor.

The equivalent circuit of the system is as shown in Figure 5.

Equivalent circuit for balanced voltage system
Figure 5 – Equivalent circuit for balanced voltage system

The series connected relays are of relatively high impedance, because of this the CT secondary winding resistances are not of great significance and the pilot resistance can be moderately large without significantly affecting the operation of the system.

This is why the scheme was developed for feeder protection.

Stability Limit of the Voltage Balance System

Unlike normal current transformers, transactors are not subject to errors caused by the progressive build-up of exciting current, because the whole of the primary current is expended as exciting current.

In consequence, the secondary e.m.f. is an accurate measure of the primary current within the linear range of the transformer. Provided the transformers are designed to be linear up to the maximum value of fault current, balance is limited only by the inherent limit of accuracy of the transformers, and as a result of capacitance between the pilot cores.

A broken line in the equivalent circuit shown in Figure 5 indicates such capacitance. Under through-fault conditions the pilots are energized to a proportionate voltage, the charging current flowing through the relays.

The stability ratio that can be achieved with this system is only moderate and a bias technique is used to overcome the problem.

Go back to contents ↑

2.2 Circulating Current

In Figure 6 the pilot currents add at each end to produce a circulating current for an external fault. The majority of current again flows through the restraint coil.

Circulating current protection scheme
Figure 6 – Circulating current protection scheme

When the balancing current transformers of a unit protection system differ in excitation characteristics, or have unequal burdens, the transient flux build-ups will differ and an increased ‘spill’ current will result.

There is a consequent risk of relay operation on a healthy circuit under transient conditions, which is clearly unacceptable.

One solution is to include a stabilizing resistance in series with the relay. Details of how to calculate the value of the stabilizing resistor are usually included in the instruction manuals of all relays that require one.

When a stabilizing resistor is used, the relay current setting can be reduced to any practical value, the relay now being a voltage-measuring device. There is obviously a lower limit, below which the relay element does not have the sensitivity to pick up.


A problem with these two different arrangements (balance voltage and circulating current schemes) is that damage to the pilot cable may result in the following:

  • Open circuit of pilot cable – the circuit could trip in the circulating current arrangement for through faults or high load current
  • Short circuit of pilot cable – the circuit could trip in the balanced voltage arrangement. This problem is summarised in Table 1.

Table 1 – Potential problems

Protection Type Pilot Cable Open Circuited Pilot Cable Short Circuited
Circulating Current Trip Inoperative
Balanced Voltage Inoperative Trip

Go back to contents ↑

Typical pilot protection scheme

Typical pilot protection scheme
Figure 7 – Typical pilot protection scheme

Go back to contents ↑

3. Digital Differential Unit Protection

Digital differential line protection relays at each end of the line determines digital values to represent the current flowing at that point on the line.

These digital values are communicated to the relay at the opposite end for comparison.

Where the local and remote digital values are the same indicates a healthy power line, however where the digital values differ this would indicate a fault and the circuit breakers at each end are tripped by the local relay.

Line protection using digital differential communications via optical fibre or multiplexed channels
Figure 8 – Line protection using digital differential communications via optical fibre or multiplexed channels

Go back to contents ↑

4. Phase Comparison Carrier

Another form of unit protection is phase comparison carrier protection in which the phase angle of the current at each end of the line is compared. The communications channel is the line itself. A high frequency signal is injected across two phases of the transmission circuit at one end and received at the other.

The arrangements for signal injection are shown in Figure 9.

The wave traps (parallel resonant circuits) are designed to present a very high resistance at the signal frequency (several hundred KHz) and negligible resistance at power frequency (50Hz).

With this arrangement at each end, the signal is restricted to the line and cannot pass into other circuits.

Phase comparison carrier protection
Figure 9 – Phase comparison carrier protection

A simplified carrier protection arrangement is shown in Figure 10.

The transmitted and received signal blocks are approximately 180 degrees out of phase. This is due to the End A and End B apparatus being identical while the primary current is being exported at one end and imported at the other.

For this condition, the protection is stable. The continuous signal (obtained by superimposing the blocks upon each other) ‘holds off’ the trip function. For a fault condition, the current at the import End B reverses to feed the fault.

The blocks of signal would be in phase with End A. When superimposed, gaps of approximately 180 degrees are left.

Carrier protection - Internal fault
Figure 10 – Carrier protection – Internal fault

These gaps initiate tripping. The angle of gaps (for which tripping occurs) varies, a 30 degree setting being typical. The time to trip is in the order of 3 to 4 cycles.

Carrier protection does not, however, compare ends continuously. It must be ‘started’ by the output from a starting network. The three-phase load conditions are monitored via current transformers. The secondary currents produce an output from the starting network. This is initiated by a sudden increase in load, high load or unbalanced phase currents.

Such conditions prompt only the comparison of ends. The equipment stabilizes if the conditions are due to a through fault.

Usually, carrier protection arrangements have a self-testing feature, for example, a clock starting every 30 minutes or 12 hours, depending on the type of protection. If one end of a carrier system fails and locks out, the system becomes unstable for through faults or high currents.

Go back to contents ↑


  1. Switching Operator’s Manual Transmission Switching by Horizon Power
  2. Network Protection and Application Guide, Protective Relays, Measurement and Control by Alstom Grid

Premium Membership

Premium membership gives you an access to specialized technical articles and extra premium content (electrical guides and software).
Get Premium Now ⚡

Edvard Csanyi

Electrical engineer, programmer and founder of EEP. Highly specialized for design of LV/MV switchgears and LV high power busbar trunking (<6300A) in power substations, commercial buildings and industry facilities. Professional in AutoCAD programming.


  1. Godfred Kuwornu
    Jun 04, 2019

    Nice article. Please can I get a copy of the pdfs.

  2. Abdul Mannan Mollah
    Jun 04, 2019

    Excellent demonstrating diagram and text. Still on study. If found any improvement will be fed back soon

Leave a Comment

Tell us what you're thinking... we care about your opinion!