Search

Premium Membership

Get access to premium HV/MV/LV technical articles, electrical guides, research studies and much more! Get 20% OFF Code: EEP08PR
Home / Technical Articles / What’s important for water power designer to make the right choice of a turbine

Right choice of a turbine

The water power designer has to make a choice on the type of turbine that can be adopted for a particular project.

What's important for water power designer to make the right choice of a turbine
What’s important for water power designer to make the right choice of a turbine (on photo: Pelton water turbine wheel runner; credit: francishydroturbines.com)

After the range of head to be handled by a turbine has been evaluated by stream flow analysis and the installed capacity determined from the analysis of the power-generating capacity of the proposed plant, the task of the designer is to choose:

  1. An optimum turbine type and series,
  2. The number of power generating units,
  3. The runner diameter,
  4. Rotational speed, and
  5. Runner axis elevation.
Knowing the total installation at the power station, the number of units can be decided. The capacity of the plant should be fixed as high as possible with adequate care on efficient running and low initial costs, and available transport and shipping facilities.

The following Bureau of Indian Standard Codes of practices may be referred to for the detailed design of hydraulic turbines and their selections:

  1. IS:12837-1989 “Hydraulic turbines for mediumand large power houses – guidelines for selection
  2. IS: 12800-1993 “ Guidelines for selection of turbines, preliminary dimensioning and layout of surface hydro-electric power houses”:
    • Part 1: Medium and large power houses
    • Part 2: Pumped storage power houses
    • Part 3: Small, mini and micro hydroelectric power houses

One of the important parameters of a turbine is the Specific Speed denoted as ns, which and defined as the speed in r.p.m. at which a turbine of homologous design would operate, if the runner were to reduce to a size which would develop one metric horse power under one metre head.

It is given by the following relation:

Specific speed of turbine in r.p.m.

where:

ns = Specific speed of turbine in revolutions per minute (r.p.m.)
n = Rated speed of turbine in revolutions per minute
P = Turbine output in kW, and
H = Rated head in metres.

Once the specific speed (ns) is determined, the chart given in IS: 12837-1989 and reproduced in Figure 1 may be used to determine the type of turbine that may be adopted for the particular project.

Chart for determining the selection of turbine
Figure 1 – Chart for determining the selection of turbine

The type of turbine selected also depends upon techno-economic considerations of the generating equipment, power house cast and relative benefits of power generation.

The factors given in the following table determine the type of turbine to be used depending upon site conditions.

Type of Machine Head variation percent of rated head (m) Load variation percent of rated outlet Specific speed (m-mhp) Peak Efficiency in percent
Pelton 120 to 80 50 to 100 15 to 65 90
Francis 125 to 65 50 to 100 60 to 400 93
Deriaz 125 to 65 50 to 100 200 to 400 92
Kaplan 125 to 65 40 to 100 300 to 800 92
Propeller 110 to 90 90 to 100 300 to 800 92
Bulb 125 to 65 40 to 100 600 to 1200 92

Additional Notes

The following points may additionally be noted:

1. The performance of a turbine is ideal at the design head.

Fall of efficiency in case of Pelton, Kaplan and Bulb turbinesis much less in comparison to Francis-and Propeller types.

Therefore in overlapping head ranges selection of type of turbine should consider the head variation existing at site.

2. Turbine efficiency varies with load. Fall of efficiency at part load for Francis and Propeller is much steeper in comparison to that for Kaplan and Pelton turbines. Therefore, necessity of operating turbinesat part loads for longer timeinfluences the choice of turbines in the overlapping head ranges.

Thus in the head ranges where both Kaplan and Francis are suitable.

The requirement of large pressure head and electrical load variation dictates, Kaplan turbine to be superior to Francis turbine from considerations of higher power generation on account of better overall efficiency.

Similarly, in the overlapping head ranges where both Francis and Pelton could be used, Pelton has advantages over Francis in overall performance level when variation of load and head is higher.

3. Highest specific speed of turbine resulting in higher speed of rotation for generator with consequent reduction in cost of generator. This criteria is very important for selecting-type of turbine from cost consideration in the overlapping head ranges.


Kaplan turbine / Run-of-the-river hydroelectricity – How it works!

Cant see this video? Click here to watch it on Youtube.


Working of Francis Turbine

Cant see this video? Click here to watch it on Youtube.


715 Kw Pelton turbine

Cant see this video? Click here to watch it on Youtube.

Reference: Hydropower Engineering – Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur

Premium Membership

Premium membership gives you an access to specialized technical articles and extra premium content (electrical guides and software).
Get Premium Now ⚡
author-pic

Edvard Csanyi

Electrical engineer, programmer and founder of EEP. Highly specialized for design of LV/MV switchgears and LV high power busbar trunking (<6300A) in power substations, commercial buildings and industry facilities. Professional in AutoCAD programming.

Leave a Comment

Tell us what you're thinking... we care about your opinion!