India is the world’s fourth largest economy and has a fast growing energy market. India’s current power capacity is 30% short of demand. Coal and petroleum are the primary sources of energy. High ash content in Indian coal and inefficient combustion technologies contribute to India’s emission of air particulate matter and other trace gases, including gases that are responsible for the greenhouse effect.
Climate change is one of the most serious single challenges faced by humankind today. Probably one of the greatest impacts in reducing CO2 emissions will be made by the introduction of Zero Emission Fossil Fuel Power Plants including carbon dioxide capture and storage.
CO2 is the main greenhouse gas due to the very high overall amount emitted by human activities, and about one third of the overall human CO2 emissions are produced by the power generation sector.
The zero-emission power plant is no longer a fantasy!
Filters are becoming increasingly sophisticated; removing dust and other harmful substances from exhaust Gases. And in the future, new power generation technologies should prevent Emissions of carbon dioxide getting into the atmosphere. Enhanced measurement Methods and more efficient power distribution are also helping to ensure cleaner air.
Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle power plant
The Oxy-blown power plants are more compatible than our conventional power plants regarding on emission levels. Among them Integrated Gasification combined Cycle power plant is the best one.
Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) plants are already in operation. Here, a fuel such as coal is converted, with the addition of oxygen, into synthesis gas [Gasification]. Syngas is the primary fuel for IGCC applications. Natural gas is used for start up and as a backup fuel. During the start up process at 30% load, the gas turbine is transitioned to syngas and taken to base load and mainly carbon monoxide and hydrogen.
The gasification process can produce syngas from high-sulfur coal, heavy petroleum residues and biomass.
The plant is called integrated because its syngas is produced in a gasification unit in the plant which has been optimized for the plant’s combined cycle. In this example the syngas produced is used as fuel in a gas turbine which produces electrical power. To improve the overall process efficiency heat is recovered from both the gasification process and also the gas turbine exhaust in ‘Waste Heat Boilers’ producing steam. This steam is then used in steam turbines to produce additional electrical power.
The main feature is that instead of using oxygen and nitrogen to gasify coal, they use oxygen and CO2. The main advantage is that it is possible to improve the performance of cold gas efficiency and to reduce the unburned carbon (char).
- Proven lowest NOx, SOx, particulate matter and lower hazardous air pollutants,
- Proven mercury and carbon dioxide removal,
- Lower water usage, lower solids production
- Sulfur and non-leachable slag by-products
In an IGCC plant, CO2 can be separated during the synthesis gas preparation stage. However, separation compression and storage of the gas reduces the efficiency by about 12 percentage points. IGCC plants can also be fed biomass or wastes from the chemical industry such as asphalt and even car tires.
IGCC is essentially the only coal technology that can effectively remove mercury from the environment. Carbon beds have demonstrated 99.9% mercury removal from syngas (post “gas-clean-up”).
Carbon Capture and Reduction Techniques
Before carbon dioxide (CO2) gas can be sequestered from power plants and other point sources, it must be captured as a relatively pure gas. CO2 is routinely separated and captured as a by-product from industrial processes such as synthetic ammonia production, H2 production, and limestone calcination.
There are three technology routes to capturing CO2: pre-combustion, post-combustion and oxyfuel combustion. post-combustion and oxyfuel combustion technologies that can be retrofitted to today’s coal plants. Both technologies are feasible, safe and have the potential to be cost-effective.
The challenge lies in developing the processes so that they can be deployed economically on a large scale.
CO2 Capture Options
CO2 capture involves the separation of CO2 from combustion gases and compressing it so that it is suitable for safe transport and storage. There are three basic capture systems to isolate CO2 from the combustion process: post-combustion separation, oxy-fuel firing, and pre-combustion separation.
In this process, the CO2 is separated from the flue gases after combustion has taken place. Instead of being discharged directly to the atmosphere, the flue gas is passed through an absorbent or a selective membrane, which separates most of the CO2.
The CO2, previously compressed, is fed to a storage reservoir and the remaining flue gas is discharged into the atmosphere.
Pre-combustion capture involves reacting the fuel with oxygen or air, and possibly also with steam, to produce a ‘synthesis gas (syngas)’ or ‘fuel gas’, composed mainly of carbon monoxide and hydrogen. The carbon monoxide is then reacted with steam in a catalytic reactor, called a shift converter, to give CO2 and more hydrogen. Next, the CO2 is separated, usually by a physical or chemical absorption process, resulting in a hydrogen-rich fuel which can be used in many applications, such as boilers, furnaces, gas turbines, engines and fuel cells.
In oxy-fuel combustion, nearly pure oxygen is used for combustion instead of air, resulting in a flue gas that is mainly CO2 and H2O. This simplifies the separation process as the water vapour can readily be condensed to liquid, leaving the CO2 for subsequent treatment.
Carbon Control Technologies for Existing Plants
The several innovative schemes that could significantly reduce CO2 capture costs, compared to conventional processes.
1 Oxyfuel Combustion processes use oxygen rather than air for combustion. The oxy-fuel cycles are a promising technology. The combustion with pure oxygen leads to a working fluid consisting mainly of steam and CO2, which allows an easy and cost-effective CO2 separation by steam condensation. Further advantages are the great variety of fuels which can be used (natural gas, syngas from coal or biomass gasification, etc.) and the low NOx generation, since nitrogen is only introduced by fuel bound nitrogen or as a residue in the oxygen to the combustion chamber.
The generated NOx as well as other gases are removed together with CO2, so that no pollutants are emitted to atmosphere. This produces exhaust gas that is mainly water vapor and CO2. The exhaust gas has a relatively high CO2 concentration (greater than 80percent by volume).
Oxyfuel combustion represents an opportunity to improve the economics of CO2 capture.
2 Solvents and Sorbents for CO2 separation from flue gas (both physical and chemical) can be further enhanced to reduce cost, improve reaction rates and regeneration loads, and eliminate contamination from other pollutants. This includes technologies such as aqueous ammonia, advanced amines, ionic liquids, metal organic frameworks, and amine-enriched sorbents.
3 Advanced Membranes for both oxygen-separation and CO2 capture are key enabling technologies. This effort will evaluate needs for advanced membranes applicable to pulverized coal systems and other conventional combustion systems that will minimize the cost and efficiency losses for CO2 separation.
4 Chemical Looping processes that prevent direct contact of air and fuel offer the ability to produce a relatively pure stream of CO2 that does not need to be separated from flue gas. Technical challenges remain in key areas such as solids handling and oxygen carrier capacity, reactivity, and attrition.
Economic studies indicate that carbon capture will add over 30 percent to the cost of electricity for new integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) units and over 80 percent to the cost of electricity if retrofitted to existing pulverized coal (PC) units.
CO2 storage and use
Once captured and transported, most CO2 will be stored in geological reservoirs. The most of the countries are interested in a number of such reservoirs, including depleted and disused oil and gas fields, deep saline aquifers and deep un-mined coal seams or in the form of mineral carbonates.
CO2 Storage Options
Depleted Oil and Gas Fields
These present a significant possibility for CO2 storage, with European capacities estimated at 14.5 billion tonnes offshore and 13.1 billion tonnes .
Enhanced Oil (and Gas) Recovery
As an intermediate step, there is scope for injecting CO2 into mature fields to improve the recovery of oil (and gas) through Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR), increasing production by 4-20%.
These have by far the greatest potential for storing CO2, globally as well as in Europe. Such aquifers are sedimentary rocks (usually sandstone and less frequently limestone or other rocks), which are porous enough to store great volumes of CO2 and permeable enough to allow the flow of fluids.
Storage of CO2 will take place at depths below some 7-800 meters where CO2 behaves as a fluid, and where the pores of the sediments are filled with salt water.
Un-mineable coal seams
These offer another opportunity to store CO2 at a low net cost. In Enhanced Coal Bed Methane (ECBM) projects if a production well is opened, the coal adsorbs CO2 and N2 and methane is displaced, enhancing its production. While this approach is still in its early stages and needs more research, it is considered a promising concept due to the added value of the produced methane.
Detailed knowledge and understanding are needed as to where and how CO2 can be stored. This understanding must include, for example, geographical locations, capacities, future behaviour in reservoirs, and associated risks, together with both national and international legal constraints. Attention must be given to the development of a monitoring methodology capable of building trust and confidence amongst citizens living in the vicinity of storage sites.
An SOFC-GT system is one which comprises a solid oxide fuel cell combined with a gas turbine. Further combination of the SOFC-GT in a combined heat and power plant also has the potential to yield even higher thermal efficiencies in some cases. In these plant SOFC is using as a replacement to combustor near gas turbine. It will generate electrical power at greater than 45% electrical efficiency.
Within the SOFC module the desulfurized fuel is utilized electrochemically and oxidized below the temperature for NOx generation. Therefore NOx and SOx emissions for the SOFC power generation system are near negligible. The byproducts of the power generation from hydrocarbon fuels that are released into the environment are CO2 and water vapor.
The development of methods to capture and sequester the CO2, resulting in a Zero Emission power generation system.
- These are compact, lower cost equipment
- It has greater cycle efficiencies with advanced turbines.
- Complete carbon capture results the Zero emission(ultra low emission)
- The required amount of thermal energy is been supplied for desalination of water.
- Zero Emission Power Plant has “triple benefit”.
- Carbon dioxide is captured and used for another application.
- Zero Emission power generated.
- Additional oil is produced from existing wells.
- The largest disadvantage is the high operating temperature which results in longer start-up times and mechanical and chemical compatibility issues.
- Fuelling fuel cells is still a problem since the production, transportation, distribution and storage of hydrogen is difficult.
- The cost of CO2 captures using current technology, of carbon – much too high for carbon emissions reduction applications.
In present scenario, combustion of fuels is at the heart of today’s power generating system. It leads to the emission of green house gases which causes Global warming. Among these gases CO2 constitutes the major proportion.
The development of methods to capture and sequester the CO2, results in a Zero Emission power generation system and hence overall performance and efficiency increases.
SkyNano, which began in 2017, uses an electrochemical process to convert CO2 to solid carbon nanotubes rather than a thermochemical process used in conventional nanotube production. The only byproduct is oxygen, in contrast to carbon monoxide, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and volatile organic compounds (VOVO +1.7%Cs) from other methods. No need for a carbon dioxide burial.
I like your idea and impressed very much. I want to make small model of this project to present in my college will u help me.
sure sneha..contact me [email protected]
thank u edvard sir…Its my pleasure to write on your blog…
To find more info about co2 capturing technologies plz visit http://www.co2captureproject.com/ thank you…
Thank you Vinod, excellent write-up!
Friends i am working on this topic to know more and more about this mainly economic details…….
I am very much interested in power plants….if you have any queries contact me at
email: [email protected]
follow me on facebook as Vinod Ramireddy