5 Factors That Mess Up Motor Efficiency and How To Improve It
5 Factors That Mess Up Motor Efficiency and How To Improve It (on photo: Baldor M2510 Motor; 10 HP; 230/460 V; 27.2 A; 1760 RPM; 60 Hz)

Motor efficiency vs Energy losses

It must be emphasised that the standard electric motor is already a very efficient device with efficiencies above 80% over most of the working range, rising to over 90% at full load. However, because of the high energy consumption, and the very large number of installed units, even a small increase in motor efficiency can have a major impact on costs.

The efficiency of an electric motor depends on the choice of materials used for the core and windings, their physical arrangement and the care and precision with which they are handled and assembled.

Losses can be categorised into two groups. Those that are relatively independent of load (constant losses), and those that increase with load (load dependent losses).

The factors that affect efficiency are //

  1. Conductor content – load dependent
  2. Magnetic steel -mainly constant
  3. Thermal design – mainly load dependent
  4. Aerodynamic design – constant
  5. Manufacture and quality control – constant

1. Conductor Content

Resistive losses in the windings increase with the square of the current (which increases with the load) and normally account for around 35% of the total losses.

These resistive losses can be reduced by putting more copper into the windings – using a thicker gauge wire – and improving manufacturing techniques to shorten the end windings (which do not contribute to output power, but do contribute to loss).

Since more copper requires more space, both for the end windings and in the stator slots, the volume of material in the magnetic circuit would be reduced, leading to earlier saturation and increased iron losses. Consequently, it is necessary to increase the length of the magnetic core, and sometimes the diameter as well.

Normally, the increased length is accommodated by increasing the overhang at the non-drive end of the unit. Because copper losses are load-dependent, the benefit of increasing the copper content is most apparent at high loading. Since the coefficient of resistance of copper is positive, the losses increase as temperature rises.

Loss against load for a typical standard motor
Figure 1 – Loss against load for a typical standard motor

Go back to Motor Efficiency Factors ↑

2. Magnetic steel

Magnetic steel is the most expensive component of the motor, so any increase in the total amount used is undesirable on cost grounds. The iron losses are of two types – hysteresis loss and eddy current loss.

Hysteresis loss is due to the non-linearity of the flux density/magnetising force curve and is a property of the steel itself and to minimise it two properties are required – a low energy loss and good high field permeability, i.e. the steel must be easy to magnetise and must not saturate at high flux densities of up to 1.8 Tesla.

This is the subject of on-going research that is making promising progress. Eddy-current losses are due to induced current in the stator laminations and are reduced by reducing the thickness of the laminations and by ensuring good insulation between adjacent laminations.

Figure 2 - Magnetization and hysteresis curves
Figure 2 – Magnetization and hysteresis curves

Thinner laminations are, naturally much more expensive to produce and more difficult to handle, so the chosen thickness is always a compromise. Magnetic losses are particularly important when the supply is distorted by harmonics because eddy current losses increase with the square of the frequency while hysteresis losses are proportional to frequency.

The benefit of using improved magnetic steel is a reduction in loss across the whole of the working range, but, because it is not load dependent, it is particularly apparent at low loadings.

Go back to Motor Efficiency Factors ↑

3. Thermal design

New modelling techniques have allowed the production of motors with optimised cooling flow, reduced clearances (increasing the efficiency of the magnetic circuit) and lower copper losses. Lower losses and good thermal design result in lower operating temperatures and hence a longer service life.

Reliance high efficiency explosion-proof motor by Baldor Electric Company
Figure 3 – Reliance high efficiency explosion-proof motor by Baldor Electric Company (photo credit:

Go back to Motor Efficiency Factors ↑

4. Aerodynamics

Most electric motors are cooled by drawing air through the windings by an integral fan and exhausting it over the externally ribbed casing. The airflow is complex and computer modeling has been used to optimize the design of the fan and cowling to produce more efficient cooling with a lower noise level.

Windage losses can be reduced by careful design of the rotor.

Go back to Motor Efficiency Factors ↑

5. Manufacture and quality control

The introduction of stresses in the magnetic steel during motor assembly can increase iron loss by up to 50%. By considering assembly techniques at the design stage and by paying attention to handling techniques, this increase in iron loss during manufacture has been reduced to negligible proportions. Eccentricity between the stator and rotor generates harmonic fluxes with consequently higher losses.

The overall result of these improvements is an increase in efficiency of 3% (corresponding to a reduction in loss of about 30%) at full load and a halving of losses at low loads. Figure 4 shows the comparison between the efficiency of 75 kW standard and high efficiency motors against actual load.

Comparison of efficiencies of standard and high-efficiency motors
Figure 4 – Comparison of efficiencies of standard and high efficiency motors

Because many motors spend considerable time running at low loading or idling, designers of high efficiency units have paid great attention to reduction of the constant losses.

The result is a halving of losses at loadings less than 25% load and an efficiency improvement of 3 to 5% at full load, a reduction in losses of about 28%. This represents an impressive achievement.

Go back to Motor Efficiency Factors ↑

Reference // A Good Practice Guide to Electrical Design – Copper Development Association

About Author //


Edvard Csanyi

Edvard - Electrical engineer, programmer and founder of EEP. Highly specialized for design of LV high power busbar trunking (<6300A) in power substations, buildings and industry fascilities. Designing of LV/MV switchgears.Professional in AutoCAD programming and web-design.Present on


  1. john carlo
    Feb 01, 2016

    i think beer symbolizes the REAL POWER, REACTIVE POWER ,& APPARENT POWER.hehe. that’s my opinion

  2. Well, Ed, I am the opposite of Deon. I too was curious because of the beer bottle, and would not have clicked through to article if it was not for wondering what the beer bottle had to do with it. I think it was a clever marketing ploy for the article, be intentional or non-intentional. :)

    • Edvard
      Dec 27, 2015

      Hehe, Don, you’re damn right :) I tought I overextend with the meaning of the word ‘Mess’ with a beer on pic, but yes, it’s a kind of marketing trick to attract readers. I’m bringing it back :)

      Thanks for the comment!

  3. Deon
    Dec 23, 2015

    Hi, I do not see any reason for the beer bottle next to the motor in the article. My personal view is that it distract the attention from the good article.

    • Edvard
      Dec 23, 2015

      Well Deon, I stopped and thought about what you just said, and decided to change the image. You were right, it’s a kind of inappropriate, thank you.

Leave a Comment

Tell us what you're thinking... we care about your opinion!