Search

Premium Membership ♕

Experience matters. Learn from experienced electrical engineers. Study specialized LV/HV technical articles, papers and courses.

Home / Technical Articles / Surge Protective Devices In TN Systems (Guide For Low Voltage Electricians)

Fault conditions

For “protection against electric shock under fault conditions“ in TN systems, overcurrent and residual current devices have been approved. For the use of surge protective devices (SPDs) this means that these protective devices may only be arranged downstream of the devices for “protection against electric shock under fault conditions” in order to ensure that the measure to protect against life hazards also operates in the event of a failure of an SPD (surge protective device).

Surge Protective Devices In TN Systems (Guide For Low Voltage Electricians)
Surge Protective Devices In TN Systems (Guide For Low Voltage Electricians); photo credit: ienergytech.com.au

If a Type 1 or 2 surge protective device (SPD) is installed downstream of a residual current device, it has to be expected that, because of the discharged impulse current to PE, this process will be interpreted as residual current by a residual current device (RCD), and it interrupts the circuit.


Equivalents for SPD classifications

(In the following lines we will use the designation SPD Type 1,SPD Type 2, SPD Type 3)

 Definition acc. to IEC 61643Definition acc.
to EN 61643
SPDs which withstand the partial lightning current with a typical waveform 10/350 μs require a corresponding impulse test current Iimp
The suitable test current Iimp is defined in the Class I test procedure of IEC 61643-1
SPD class ISPD Type 1
SPDs which withstand induced surge currents with a typical waveform 8/20 μs require a corresponding impulse test current In
The suitable test current In is defined in the Class II test procedure of IEC 61643-1
SPD class IISPD Type 2
SPDs that withstand induced surge currents with a typical waveform 8/20 μs and require a corresponding impulse test current Isc
The suitable combination wave test is defined in the Class III test procedure of IEC 61643-1
SPD class IIISPD Type 3

Moreover, if an SPD Type 1 is loaded with partial lightning currents it must be assumed that the high dynamics of the lightning current will cause mechanical damage on the residual current device (Figure 1 below).

This would override the protective measure “protection against electric shock under fault conditions”.

RCD destroyed by lightning impulse current
Figure 1 – RCD destroyed by lightning impulse current

Of course, this must be avoided. Therefore both lightning current arresters Type 1 and SPDs Type 2 should be used upstream of the residual current device. Hence, for SPDs Type 1 and 2, the only possible measure for “protection against electric shock under fault conditions” is using overcurrent protective devices.

The use of SPDs must therefore always be considered in conjunction with a fuse as the overcurrent protective device. Whether or not a supplementary separate backup fuse must be designated for the arrester branch, depends on the size of the next upstream supply fuse and the backup fuse approved for the SPD.

The following maximum continuous voltages apply to SPDs Type 1, 2 and 3 when used in TN systems (Figures 2 and 3 A to B):

“3-0” circuit in TN-C systems
Figure 2 – “3-0” circuit in TN-C systems

“4-0” circuit in TN-S systems
Figure 3A – “4-0” circuit in TN-S systems

“3+1” circuit in TN-S systems
Figure 3B – “3+1” circuit in TN-S systems


TN-C-S systems

Figure 4 illustrates an example of the connections for use of lightning current arresters and surge protective devices in TN-C-S systems.

Use of SPDs in TN-C-S systems
Figure 4 – Use of SPDs in TN-C-S systems

It can be seen that SPDs Type 3 are used downstream of the residual current device (RCD). In this context, please note the following:

As a result of the frequency of switching surges in the terminal circuits, SPDs Type 3 are primarily employed to protect against differential mode voltages. These surges generally arise between L and N.

A surge limitation between L and N means that no impulse current is discharged to PE. Thus, this process can also not be interpreted as residual current by the RCD. In all other cases, SPDs Type 3 are designed for a nominal discharge capacity of 1.5 kA. These values are sufficient in the sense that upstream protective stages of SPDs Type 1 and 2 take over the discharge of high energy impulses. When using an RCD capable of withstanding impulse currents, these impulse currents are not able to trip the RCD or cause mechanical damage.


TN-S systems

The Figures 5 to 9 illustrate the use of SPDs as part of the lightning protection zones concept, and the required lightning and surge protective measures for a TN-C-S system.


Use of SPDs in TN-S systems // Example

Use of SPDs in TN-S systems
Figure 5 – Use of SPDs in TN-S systems

SPDs used in TN systems // Examples

Example 1 //  Office Building – Separation of the PEN in the main distribution board

SPDs used in TN systems – Example: Office Building – Separation of the PEN in the main distribution board
Figure 6 – SPDs used in TN systems – Example: Office Building – Separation of the PEN in the main distribution board

Example 2 //  Office Building – Separation of the PEN in the subdistribution board

SPDs used in TN systems – Example: Office Building – Separation of the PEN in the subdistribution board
Example: Office Building – Separation of the PEN in the subdistribution board

Example 3 //  Industry – Separation of the PEN in the subdistribution board

SPDs used in TN systems – Example: Industry – Separation of the PEN in the subdistribution board
Figure 8 – SPDs used in TN systems – Example: Industry – Separation of the PEN in the subdistribution board

Example 4 //  Residential building

SPDs used in TN systems – Example: Residential building
Figure 9 – SPDs used in TN systems – Example: Residential building

Reference // Lightning protection guide – DEHN + SĂ–HNE

Premium Membership

Get access to premium HV/MV/LV technical articles, electrical engineering guides, research studies and much more! It helps you to shape up your technical skills in your everyday life as an electrical engineer.
More Information
Edvard Csanyi - Author at EEP-Electrical Engineering Portal

Edvard Csanyi

Hi, I'm an electrical engineer, programmer and founder of EEP - Electrical Engineering Portal. I worked twelve years at Schneider Electric in the position of technical support for low- and medium-voltage projects and the design of busbar trunking systems.

I'm highly specialized in the design of LV/MV switchgear and low-voltage, high-power busbar trunking (<6300A) in substations, commercial buildings and industry facilities. I'm also a professional in AutoCAD programming.

Profile: Edvard Csanyi

One Comment


  1. Eleazar Dile
    Feb 26, 2020

    thank you for the information i really like to know more…

Leave a Comment

Tell us what you're thinking. We care about your opinion! Please keep in mind that comments are moderated and rel="nofollow" is in use. So, please do not use a spammy keyword or a domain as your name, or it will be deleted. Let's have a professional and meaningful conversation instead. Thanks for dropping by!

eight  ×  one  =  

Learn How to Design Power Systems

Learn to design LV/MV/HV power systems through professional video courses. Lifetime access. Enjoy learning!

EEP Hand-Crafted Video Courses

Check more than a hundred hand-crafted video courses and learn from experienced engineers. Lifetime access included.
Experience matters. Premium membership gives you an opportunity to study specialized technical articles, online video courses, electrical engineering guides, and papers written by experienced electrical engineers.